List of Draft Proposals that should appear under a ‘Draft Proposals’ category on the forum by date. If there are a few missed ones please list to keep all in one place.
Which would you prioritise if you had to choose 3?
May 3rd 2025
1. Global Petition Chain for Assange’s Pardon
2. Global Campaign to Pardon Assange
3. Launch of the Information Freedom, Freedom of Expression Global Education & Awareness Initiative
4. Launch of the Global Information Freedom Index (GIF Index)
5. Build a Decentralized News Aggregation Platform
6. Develop a Decentralized Emergency Response Network
7. Develop the AssangeDAO Metaverse Space
8. Launch of the “Information Freedom Gamification Initiative”
9. Establish a Legal Defense Fund and Global Public Interest Legal Network
10. Expand the $JUSTICE Token Ecosystem
These are all grouped individual draft proposals appearing on one post - one has to go to the following link for the detail for each.
This relates to Project Idea: Freedom Wall
A simple app on our website that lets users write messages honoring Julian Assange’s freedom, stored on the Ethereum blockchain.
•Messages are permanently recorded and viewable on our site or via Etherscan.
•Requires a minimum donation of 0.01 ETH (~$16.39 USD), with 100% going to the DAO treasury.
•Users must hold at least 100,000 JUSTICE (~$10 USD) to write messages.
•Gas fees apply, estimated at $7–10+ in ETH per message (up to 280 characters, tweet-length).
•Website could sort messages by “Newest to Oldest” or by donation amount to encourage larger contributions.
Comment - **Project Idea: Decentralized WikiLeaks". I looked into this a bit more deeply and I do really like the idea of having a decentralised wikileaks archive. This could be similar to https://www.projectspartacus.xyz/, which Gabriel has been involved with, or it could be combined with Amir’s DarkLeaks idea. Project Spartacus is relaunching in July.
AssangeDAO NFT Art Contest - I think this one as it combines the ‘freedom’ alignment with a NFT element. [The PAK open edition NFT raised 671 ETH ($2.1 million)]
Possible words for a new mission statement for the website
“To secure a full pardon for Julian Assange, defend press freedom, and advance global transparency by empowering whistleblowers to expose corruption and abuses of power responsibly, while inspiring a powerful decentralised digital activism network to fight for Assange’s freedom and the right to truth. The AssangeDAO seeks to advance such blockchain-based initiatives.”
Thank you for organizing the files, Peter.
From my perspective, the three most important proposals to implement are:
Return of ETH from Wau Holland
Assange Pardon Petition Chain
Multisig Signer Framework
These are the top three priorities selected through the AIP-16 vote and I have always respected the results of the vote. Following this, I believe more effort should be directed toward refining governance and strengthening infrastructure.
Versky - Which one of the links is this one included or does it combine a couple of those drafts/ideas on Zylo’s list?
That other one is Expand the $JUSTICE Token Ecosystem
Proposal Summary:
This initiative aims to strengthen the utility, liquidity, and economic sustainability of the $JUSTICE token by expanding its use cases, incentivizing long-term holding, and integrating it into the broader Web3 ecosystem. By doing so, AssangeDAO can attract more supporters, contributors, and investors while reinforcing its mission through a robust token economy.
Key Components:
• Token Utility Expansion:
Payment Use Cases:
Enable $JUSTICE to be used for:
Purchasing AssangeDAO NFTs
Accessing exclusive digital content
Buying event tickets for metaverse and real-world events
Staking & Revenue Sharing:
Introduce a staking mechanism where token holders can lock their $JUSTICE to:
Earn a share of DAO-generated revenue (e.g. NFT sales, donations, campaign funds)
Gain access to premium governance privileges or early access content
Governance Weighting:
Implement governance power scaling based on token holdings to reward long-term commitment and increase participation in DAO decision-making.
re - The update of the website - interconnects to the new mission statement.
Refer to the Mission Statement thread which partly covers views about what should appear on the Website. Im going to extract all that has been written about it - so its all in in that single place. Seems to be alot that has to be decided upon before the website gets finalised.
That one’s a separate proposal — it focuses mainly on growing AssangeDAO’s visibility and forming partnerships with other projects/DAOs, rather than on the website or token side. We can consider it later.
8. Launch of the “Information Freedom Gamification Initiative”
The metaverse and gamefi are currently a low-profile area within the cryptocurrency industry, and there is no need for us to get involved here.
Expand the $JUSTICE Token Ecosystem
The DAO is currently a nascent infant, or more accurately, a patient who has lost too much blood. For the foreseeable future, we should abandon any thought of making donations and instead focus on self-growth and strengthening our own position. We need to give ourselves a “blood transfusion” and lay the foundation to build our own “blood-generating” capabilities for the future.
Liquidity is the lifeblood of a project, but with only 3.65 ETH in our Uniswap liquidity pool, we are essentially in a dead state. Our first priority must be to drastically improve liquidity and establish a buyback mechanism. Zylo once suggested adding 10 ETH to the LP and then buying back 10 ETH within three months; we should open a discussion about this.
We must treat liquidity as our lifeblood, and the treasury should also use this opportunity to accumulate a large amount of $justice.This is our own legitimately issued asset,yet we don′t give it the importance it deserves.Only by maintaining $justice at a high market capitalization can we leverage our substantial treasury assets to achieve our vision. Otherwise, we will always be constrained by a lack of funds, and any of our ideas and our mission will be impossible to execute without financial backing. In the crypto space, you will not find a single dead project with a $1 million market cap that still wields significant influence. Not one.
The treasury should become the largest holder of $justice. All projects operate this way - the project itself is the largest holder of its own native token. However, our treasury holds very little $justice, much of which comes from Zylo’s personal donations. Having the DAO become the largest token holder would also force us to value our own issued assets, thereby revitalizing the entire community. This is a common practice in the crypto space.
We are looking forward to Binance Okx Kraken listings our $justice, so improving liquidity must be put into action immediately.
We should discard the idea that ETH is money and $justice is not.Perhaps $justice is the better money; it has the potential to achieve a better exchange rate against ETH. In the future, we can use $justice to establish partnerships with other projects.
I agree with this point of view. If a project is separated from the token economy, no one will continue to pay attention to it. If no one pays attention to a project, no matter how good the story is, it will be worthless.