 Summary
 Summary
This proposal aims to build a verifiable on-chain global petition system that allows supporters worldwide to digitally sign a message demanding the full pardon of Julian Assange.
The campaign will be powered by $JUSTICE tokens and governed by a transparent incentive mechanism to encourage participation, signature sharing, and decentralized amplification.
By combining symbolic action with on-chain verification and token utility, this initiative not only supports Assange’s cause but also reactivates AssangeDAO’s mission and community momentum.
 Core Mechanism
 Core Mechanism
- Petition Signature System
 Users connect their wallets and sign a predefined petition message (e.g., “I demand the full pardon of Julian Assange”)
Each signature records:
 The signer’s wallet address
 The signer’s wallet address
 Petition text (hash or plain text)
 Petition text (hash or plain text)
 Timestamp
 Timestamp
Each wallet may sign only once
All signatures will be publicly viewable, stored on-chain or on IPFS/Arweave
A small amount of $JUSTICE (gas) will be required to complete the signature, which will be returned to the DAO treasury
- Token Incentive Model
  Basic Participation Reward Basic Participation Reward
Successful signers will receive a small airdrop of $JUSTICE (e.g., 50 $JUSTICE)
 Invite-to-Sign Bonus
 Invite-to-Sign Bonus
Users receive a unique referral link
If someone signs through their link, the inviter gets a referral bonus (e.g., $20 JUSTICE per invite)
 Weekly Reward Cap
 Weekly Reward Cap
To prevent abuse, DAO sets a maximum reward pool (e.g., 1,000,000 $JUSTICE/week)
Any excess invites/signatures beyond the cap will still be recorded but unrewarded until next cycle
- Twitter Sharing & Amplification
 After signing, users are prompted with a Twitter share window, pre-filled with:
Their unique signer number (e.g., Signer #321)
Petition site link
Tags: #FreeAssange #JusticeChain
Upon successful tweet verification (via backend or off-chain API):
 The user receives an additional reward (e.g., 50 $JUSTICE)
 The user receives an additional reward (e.g., 50 $JUSTICE)
A weekly leaderboard will reward:
Top 5 amplifiers with a custom NFT badge and additional $JUSTICE bonus
Optional: AssangeDAO can retweet or spotlight top supporters
 Technical & Implementation Plan
 Technical & Implementation Plan
Phase	Tasks	Timeline	Team
Week 1	Finalize petition text, core flow, wallet signature logic	GTU / Community	
Week 2	Smart contract development (signing + rewards logic)	Dev team (contributor)	
Week 3	Build UI for petition + referral system	Frontend team	
Week 3–4	Set up Arweave/IPFS storage for transparency	DAO infra support	
Week 4	Testnet + Audit + Launch campaign site	Community + devs	
Ongoing	Promotion + Leaderboard + Reward distribution	DAO comms team
 Proposed Budget (Cap: 10 ETH)
 Proposed Budget (Cap: 10 ETH)
Use Case	Allocation
Smart Contract Dev & Audit	3 ETH
Frontend Development	2 ETH
Signature + Referral Reward Pool	100,000,000 $JUSTICE
Twitter API + Hosting	1 ETH
NFT Badge Design + Minting	0.5 ETH
Buffer / Ops	1.5 ETH
 Security & Anti-Spam Measures
 Security & Anti-Spam Measures
Min $JUSTICE holding check (e.g., 10k) to sign
One signature per wallet
Rate-limit signature attempts per IP
Sybil-resistant referral logic (no circular invites)
Backend to verify Twitter share links before issuing bonus
 Alignment with DAO’s Mission
 Alignment with DAO’s Mission
This initiative captures the spirit of AssangeDAO:
fighting for free speech, transparency, and decentralization — not just with money, but with participation and collective action.
It also helps reposition the DAO after a long period of stagnation by activating the community in a real, visible, and morally aligned cause.
 Voting Options
 Voting Options
 YES — Approve and fund the development of the Assange Petition Chain system using $JUSTICE for gas, rewards, and engagement.
 YES — Approve and fund the development of the Assange Petition Chain system using $JUSTICE for gas, rewards, and engagement.
 NO — Do not proceed with this initiative.
 NO — Do not proceed with this initiative.

 When NFTs May Be More Appropriate
 When NFTs May Be More Appropriate Best Practice: Combine Both
 Best Practice: Combine Both