Some Proposal Ideas

General
1

Global Petition Chain for Assange’s Pardon
Proposal Summary:

Leverage blockchain technology to create a decentralized global petition platform that collects signatures in support of Julian Assange’s pardon. The platform will serve as a tamper-proof public record that can be submitted to relevant governments and international institutions.

Specific Measures:

• Platform Features:

  • Anonymous Signatures: Utilize zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to allow users to sign the petition anonymously, protecting their privacy.
  • Blockchain Recording: Store signature data on Ethereum or Arweave to ensure transparency and immutability.
  • Multilingual Support: Offer interfaces in English, Spanish, Chinese, and other languages to encourage global participation.
  • Public Query Access: Allow the public to view the total number of signatures and their distribution (e.g., by country), enhancing credibility and impact.

• Implementation:

  • Layer 2 Deployment: Develop the platform on a low-cost Layer 2 solution such as Polygon to minimize gas fees.
  • Privacy Partnerships: Collaborate with privacy tech communities (e.g., the Tor Project) to ensure secure signing processes.

• Community Involvement:

  • $JUSTICE Token Voting: Token holders can vote on the petition wording and target recipients (e.g., the U.S. government, the United Nations).
  • Incentivized Promotion: Encourage users to share the petition via social media by rewarding them with tokens or NFT badges.

• Outreach Strategy:

  • Launch global campaigns on Twitter, Reddit, and Telegram to engage human rights groups, journalists, and the public.
  • Collaborate with pro-Assange organizations (e.g., the Free Assange movement) to maximize reach and credibility.

Expected Outcomes:

  • Collect millions of signatures, building strong international pressure to advance the pardon process.
  • Strengthen AssangeDAO’s global influence and attract new supporters.
  • Leverage blockchain technology to ensure the petition’s transparency and credibility, boosting public trust.
1 Like
2

“Global Campaign to Pardon Assange”:

Proposal Summary:

Organize a global advocacy campaign, both online and offline, using multilingual content, artistic initiatives, and social media challenges to call for Julian Assange’s pardon and expand public support.

Specific Measures:

• Promotional Formats:

  • Social Media Challenge: Launch a #FreeAssangeNow challenge, encouraging users to share videos, art, or personal stories, with rewards in $JUSTICE tokens.
  • Artistic Events: Fund Assange-themed art exhibitions, concerts, or documentaries, showcased in the metaverse (e.g., Decentraland) or in physical cities.
  • Multilingual Content: Create promotional materials in English, Chinese, Spanish, and other languages to reach a global audience.

• Community Participation:

  • Encourage $JUSTICE token holders to submit creative campaign ideas or organize local events, earning tokens or NFT rewards.
  • Use governance voting to select campaign themes and fund specific projects.

• Partnership Opportunities:

  • Collaborate with human rights organizations (e.g., Amnesty International), journalist associations, and public figures (e.g., Roger Waters) to amplify impact.
  • Partner with decentralized media platforms to publish censorship-resistant content.

• Outreach Strategy:

  • Promote the campaign through platforms like TikTok, Twitter, and Instagram to engage younger generations.
  • Launch a global “Pardon Assange Day” with coordinated online and offline events to generate media coverage.
2 Likes
3

Launch of the Information Freedom, Freedom of Expression Global Education & Awareness Initiative

Proposal Summary:

Through a combination of online and offline initiatives, this program aims to educate the global public on the importance of information freedom, freedom of expression, and the significance of Julian Assange’s case. It will foster stronger community cohesion and expand AssangeDAO’s international impact.

Key Components:

• Online Learning Modules:

  • Develop free, decentralized educational courses on topics such as blockchain, privacy-preserving technologies, whistleblower protection, and the history of Julian Assange’s legal case.
  • Completion of courses can be incentivized with NFT-based certificates, enabling on-chain proof of participation and skills.

• Documentary & Media Partnerships:

  • Fund or crowdfund the production of a documentary on Assange and the fight for information freedom, to be distributed via decentralized platforms like Odysee or DTube.
  • Engage the community to promote the film, with $JUSTICE token rewards for effective outreach.

• Global Events & “Information Freedom Day”:

  • Organize an annual “Information Freedom Day”, inviting supporters worldwide to host workshops, art exhibitions, film screenings, or hackathons that promote the mission of AssangeDAO.
  • Create an open toolkit for local organizers to easily replicate and scale events.

• Social Media & Community Engagement:

  • Strengthen the DAO’s presence on Twitter, Discord, and Telegram with multilingual, educational content.
  • Launch thematic content series to appeal to non-crypto audiences, including journalists, students, and digital rights activists.

Expected Outcomes:

  • Raise global awareness of Julian Assange’s case and the broader issues of transparency and digital rights.
  • Attract new community members through accessible educational content, enhancing DAO engagement and retention.
  • Increase brand visibility through media collaborations and real-world impact, attracting potential allies and donors.
2 Likes
4

Launch of the Global Information Freedom Index (GIF Index)

Proposal Summary:

Create a blockchain-based Global Information Freedom Index to evaluate countries’ performance in freedom of expression, press freedom, and transparency. This project aims to position AssangeDAO as a thought leader in the global fight for information rights and digital liberty.

Key Components:

• Index Framework:

  • Evaluation Metrics: The index will assess countries based on key indicators such as:
    • Degree of media censorship
    • Strength of whistleblower protection laws
    • Internet freedom and digital surveillance
    • Transparency in governance and public information access
  • Data Sources: The index will be built on a combination of:
    • Publicly available datasets
    • Anonymous community-submitted reports
    • Third-party research from organizations like Freedom House, Reporters Without Borders, and Access Now
  • Decentralized Storage: All index data will be stored on Arweave or Ethereum to guarantee transparency, immutability, and resistance to censorship.

• Community Involvement:

  • Data Contribution & Validation:
    $JUSTICE token holders will be incentivized to:
    • Submit verified local reports or documentation
    • Review and validate other submissions
    • Earn tokens for credible and accurate contributions
  • DAO Governance:
    The community will vote on:
    • Evaluation criteria and weightings
    • Update frequency (e.g., quarterly or annually)
    • Integration of new data sources or indicators

• Outreach & Application:

  • Annual Index Report:
    Publish an annual “State of Information Freedom” report featuring rankings, trends, and analysis. Disseminate the findings through:
    • Social media campaigns
    • Decentralized media platforms (e.g., Mirror, Odysee)
  • Institutional Partnerships:
    Collaborate with human rights NGOs, investigative journalism networks, and academic institutions to:
    • Use the index for policy advocacy
    • Support journalistic research and activism
    • Inform civil society and international watchdog efforts

• Technical Infrastructure:

  • Work with data analysts, blockchain developers, and privacy engineers to ensure:
    • Data accuracy and credibility
    • Protection of sensitive sources
    • Scalability and accessibility of the platform

Expected Outcomes:

  • Establish AssangeDAO as a global authority in the domain of information freedom and digital rights.
  • Attract attention from policymakers, researchers, and media outlets, expanding the DAO’s influence and reach.
  • Increase DAO engagement through active community participation in data collection, validation, and governance.
2 Likes
5

Launch of the “Information Freedom Gamification Initiative”

Proposal Summary:

Develop a blockchain-based gamified platform that uses interactive games, educational challenges, and reward systems to engage the public in learning about information freedom, whistleblower protection, and the case of Julian Assange. The initiative aims to make complex topics accessible and engaging, especially for younger audiences.

Key Components:

• Platform Features:

  • Educational Games:
    Create interactive games—such as puzzle-solving, narrative adventures, or role-playing experiences—based on real-world whistleblower stories and Assange’s case.
  • Mission-Based Challenges:
    Users complete educational tasks (e.g., reading curated materials, watching documentaries, sharing content) to earn $JUSTICE tokens or NFT rewards as proof of participation and learning.
  • Decentralized Data Storage:
    All game data, progress logs, and reward records are stored on IPFS or Ethereum, ensuring transparency, ownership, and resistance to censorship.

• Technical Implementation:

  • Collaborate with blockchain game developers to build the platform using Web3 technologies, with integrations such as MetaMask for user interaction.
  • Deploy the platform on Layer 2 solutions like Polygon to minimize gas costs and enhance usability for a global audience.

• Community Participation:

  • Encourage community members to submit game ideas, narratives, and test the platform in exchange for token rewards.
  • Use DAO governance voting to determine:
    • Game themes and formats
    • Reward structures
    • Integration of new educational content

• Outreach & Promotion:

  • Promote the platform through:
    • Social media platforms like TikTok, Twitter, and Reddit
    • Online gaming communities and digital rights forums
  • Collaborate with influencers and streamers to attract non-crypto and younger demographics.

Expected Outcomes:

  • Broaden public awareness of information freedom and whistleblower issues through engaging, gamified learning.
  • Increase community participation and provide additional utility for $JUSTICE tokens, reinforcing the DAO economy.
  • Enhance AssangeDAO’s brand identity as innovative, youth-driven, and culturally relevant—attracting new supporters, creators, and partners.
2 Likes
6

Build a Decentralized News Aggregation Platform

Proposal Summary:

Develop a blockchain-based decentralized news aggregation platform that collects and showcases uncensored global news, encouraging citizen journalists and whistleblowers to submit content. This platform will advance the cause of transparency, resist censorship, and continue the legacy of WikiLeaks through modern Web3 infrastructure.

Key Components:

• Platform Features:

  • Decentralized Submissions:
    Enable users to anonymously submit news reports, leaked documents, and investigative stories using privacy-preserving tools (e.g. Tor integration) and store submissions on decentralized storage networks like IPFS.
  • Community-Powered Verification:
    Holders of the $JUSTICE token will participate in content validation through a decentralized voting mechanism, helping verify authenticity and reduce the spread of misinformation.
  • Multilingual Accessibility:
    Integrate open-source AI translation models to make news content accessible in multiple languages, fostering a truly global reach.
  • Censorship Resistance:
    Use decentralized domain services (e.g., ENS or IPFS gateways) and distributed hosting to prevent takedowns or access restrictions.

• Token Incentives:

  • Provide $JUSTICE token rewards to:
    • Journalists and whistleblowers submitting credible reports
    • Community members who review and verify content
    • Promoters who amplify platform reach and engagement

• Strategic Collaborations:

  • Partner with decentralized media platforms like Mirror, Lens Protocol, or Odysee to broaden distribution and embed content in Web3-native social spaces.
  • Connect with press freedom organizations to attract quality contributors and defenders of information rights.

• Pilot Project:

  • Launch an initial focus area centered on government transparency, corporate corruption, or environmental justice to:
    • Attract mission-aligned early adopters
    • Test platform functionality and community governance
    • Showcase impact and storytelling power

Expected Outcomes:

  • Provide the public with uncensored, trust-minimized news sources, continuing the legacy of WikiLeaks in a decentralized, permissionless format.
  • Strengthen the utility and demand for $JUSTICE tokens by embedding them in content creation, moderation, and curation workflows.
  • Attract journalists, whistleblowers, and readers to the AssangeDAO ecosystem, expanding its relevance and cultural footprint.
2 Likes
7

Develop the AssangeDAO Metaverse Space

Proposal Summary:

Establish a virtual presence for AssangeDAO within decentralized metaverse platforms such as Decentraland or The Sandbox. This immersive digital space will serve as a hub for community engagement, public education, and advocacy, allowing users from around the world to interact, learn, and support the cause of information freedom.

Key Components:

• Core Features:

  • Virtual Exhibitions:
    Host curated displays detailing the history of Julian Assange’s case, the broader movement for information freedom, and AssangeDAO’s achievements and campaigns.
  • Event Center:
    Organize live virtual events, including:
    • Educational lectures
    • Community AMAs (Ask Me Anything)
    • DAO governance activities such as proposal presentations and on-chain voting ceremonies
  • NFT Art Gallery:
    Showcase and sell NFT artworks themed around freedom, justice, and resistance. Proceeds can fund DAO operations, awareness campaigns, or contributor rewards.

• Technical Implementation:

  • Partner with metaverse developers and use open-source toolkits to reduce development costs and streamline customization.
  • Integrate $JUSTICE token functionality for:
    • Purchasing virtual merchandise or NFT collectibles
    • Gaining access to ticketed events
    • Unlocking special DAO-related experiences

• Community Involvement:

  • Invite DAO members and digital artists to design elements of the virtual space—such as 3D structures, murals, or interactive installations.
  • Reward meaningful contributions through token-based incentives or limited-edition NFT collectibles.

• Outreach & Promotion:

  • Leverage metaverse-native events and social channels to:
    • Attract crypto-native and Web3-savvy users
    • Onboard non-crypto participants through guided experiences
    • Partner with digital rights organizations and creative collectives for co-branded events

Expected Outcomes:

  • Offer a novel, engaging environment for global community interaction, enhancing member retention and a sense of belonging.
  • Expand AssangeDAO’s visibility among metaverse audiences, including artists, gamers, and digital activists.
  • Generate new revenue streams via virtual events and NFT sales, strengthening the DAO’s financial sustainability.
2 Likes
8

Expand the $JUSTICE Token Ecosystem

Proposal Summary:

This initiative aims to strengthen the utility, liquidity, and economic sustainability of the $JUSTICE token by expanding its use cases, incentivizing long-term holding, and integrating it into the broader Web3 ecosystem. By doing so, AssangeDAO can attract more supporters, contributors, and investors while reinforcing its mission through a robust token economy.

Key Components:

• Token Utility Expansion:

  • Payment Use Cases:
    Enable $JUSTICE to be used for:
    • Purchasing AssangeDAO NFTs
    • Accessing exclusive digital content
    • Buying event tickets for metaverse and real-world events
  • Staking & Revenue Sharing:
    Introduce a staking mechanism where token holders can lock their $JUSTICE to:
    • Earn a share of DAO-generated revenue (e.g. NFT sales, donations, campaign funds)
    • Gain access to premium governance privileges or early access content
  • Governance Weighting:
    Implement governance power scaling based on token holdings to reward long-term commitment and increase participation in DAO decision-making.

• Decentralized Exchange (DEX) Integration:

  • List $JUSTICE on major DEX platforms such as Uniswap, SushiSwap, or PancakeSwap to:
    • Improve liquidity and accessibility
    • Allow seamless trading and onboarding of new supporters

• Strategic Partnerships:

  • Collaborate with like-minded Web3 projects focused on privacy, free speech, or human rights to:
    • Accept $JUSTICE as a payment or donation token
    • Cross-promote shared initiatives and support each other’s ecosystems

• Tokenomics Optimization:

  • Design a community-governed token burn mechanism to reduce inflation and enhance value:
    • Example: Allocate a portion of NFT or merchandise sales to periodically buy back and burn $JUSTICE tokens

Expected Outcomes:

  • Increase the practical utility and perceived value of $JUSTICE, making it more attractive to both community members and investors
  • Encourage long-term holding and deeper involvement in DAO governance through incentives and weighted voting
  • Strengthen the AssangeDAO financial ecosystem by connecting the token to real use cases, fundraising strategies, and Web3 partnerships
2 Likes
9

Develop a Decentralized Emergency Response Network

Proposal Summary:

This proposal aims to establish a decentralized, blockchain-powered emergency response network to provide rapid support to whistleblowers, journalists, and activists facing censorship, persecution, or legal threats. The network will offer secure channels for assistance requests, access to legal and technical aid, and emergency funding—empowering AssangeDAO to become a global force for the protection of truth-tellers.

Key Components:

• Core Network Functions:

  • Emergency Assistance Channels:
    Receive urgent requests through secure, privacy-respecting tools such as Tor, Signal, or SecureDrop, enabling anonymous communication with the DAO.
  • Technical & Legal Support:
    Offer immediate access to:
    • Privacy tools (e.g. encryption, VPN guidance, secure hosting)
    • Legal counsel via a volunteer legal network
  • Emergency Funding:
    Establish a rapid response fund, crowdfunded via $JUSTICE tokens, with expedited disbursement to qualified aid recipients.
  • On-chain Coordination:
    Use blockchain infrastructure to log and transparently manage:
    • Assistance requests
    • Aid disbursement records
    • Volunteer actions
      (while preserving recipient privacy)

• Implementation Strategy:

  • Form a global decentralized volunteer network, including:
    • Tech professionals
    • Human rights advocates
    • Legal experts
  • Collaborate with privacy-focused organizations like The Tor Project, Tails OS, and SecureDrop to ensure technical resilience and safe communication.

• Incentive Mechanisms:

  • Reward active responders (technical, legal, logistical) with $JUSTICE tokens based on speed, quality, and impact of support.
  • Involve the DAO community in aid governance:
    • Use transparent, privacy-conscious voting to review and approve non-urgent assistance requests
    • Prevent misuse and ensure fairness

• Outreach and Awareness:

  • Promote successful interventions (with anonymized details) on social media and through partnerships with human rights NGOs.
  • Highlight the DAO’s role as a real-world actor defending freedom of information and human rights.

Expected Outcomes:

  • Deliver immediate, meaningful support to those in danger for speaking truth to power.
  • Enhance AssangeDAO’s real-world credibility and impact beyond the crypto community.
  • Build strong alliances with privacy and civil liberties organizations, expanding the DAO’s global network.
  • Foster trust and legitimacy by demonstrating transparency, actionability, and effectiveness.
2 Likes
10

Establish a Legal Defense Fund and Global Public Interest Legal Network

Proposal Summary:

This proposal calls for the creation of a dedicated legal defense fund to support Julian Assange and other whistleblowers facing legal persecution. It also aims to establish a global network of public interest lawyers aligned with the principles of free speech, transparency, and justice. Together, these initiatives will strengthen AssangeDAO’s capacity to respond to legal threats and uphold the rights of truth-tellers.

Key Components:

• Legal Defense Fund:

  • Crowdfunding Mechanism:
    Raise funds through $JUSTICE token campaigns, NFT sales, or direct donations, strictly allocated for legal expenses.
  • Secure Fund Management:
    Use multisignature wallets (e.g., Gnosis Safe) to manage and disburse funds with full transparency and community oversight.

• Global Legal Network:

  • Recruitment & Partnerships:
    Build a vetted network of public interest lawyers who support information freedom and are willing to represent whistleblowers on a pro bono or reduced-fee basis.
  • Incentive Structure:
    Offer $JUSTICE token stipends or grants to lawyers contributing their expertise, encouraging long-term engagement.

• Legal Education Resources:

  • Develop multilingual legal guides and toolkits to educate whistleblowers on:
    • How to safely upload evidence anonymously
    • Legal rights in different jurisdictions
    • Responding to legal threats or extradition attempts
  • Distribute these materials via the DAO’s website, IPFS, and allied organizations.

• Case Support via DAO Governance:

  • Enable the community to propose and vote on which legal cases or individuals receive funding, ensuring accountability and collective prioritization.

Expected Outcomes:

  • Provide robust legal defense for Julian Assange and others at risk for exposing truth and injustice.
  • Establish a resilient, global legal infrastructure to counter state and corporate legal aggression.
  • Attract lawyers, legal scholars, and human rights defenders to the DAO’s cause, expanding its reach and expertise.
  • Reinforce AssangeDAO’s mission with tangible, real-world impact in the legal arena.
3 Likes
11

Thanks Logan, genius ideas.

1 Like
12

Great idea, we gradually have preliminary token economics and incentive mechanisms to promote the development of Assange’s career.

13

How about a workspace for a core working group, basic decentralised word processing and database tools or something similar to Notion?

15

Just a few thoughts and comments…

Excellent ideas Logan. Your ideas with those of Zylos could be combined to finalise Governance.

The AssangeDAO is distinct from all the other DAOs out there and your ideas have captured this very well.Those ideas are very exciting, aren’t they??!!!

The vibe seems to be that the DAO has swung away from focusing on a decentralised platform and now would prefer to continue with Snapshot for the time being. Only the multi sigs role/rules need to be determined. Better response times is the issue. The DAO could go through another nomination process, similar to the GTU process to decide on 5 multi sigs (how many needed) and how they should be replaced (when they leave, when they don’t perform, their longevity period - 12 months?). Then take it to a vote.

Next would be to vote on who can be proposers. In this GTU transition phase - anybody can - and that is a mass improvement IMO. There doesn’t seem to be a need for any approved proposers. A proposal just has to be submitted in the correct Proposal format. I assume this requires a vote.

As per [yxssxn] suggestion (https://forum.assangedao.org/u/yxssxn) there should be working groups established soon - and the way to do that is to develop an organisation structure with “departments” and roles, such as Governance, Finance, Marketing, Legal, Technical and Research and Legal…

Then the next steps would be to generate income to cover operations and expenses either by retrieving remaining funds from WH and/or by the ideas so far proposed by Zylo, Logan and others to come.

Then sudongpo’s idea of looking at incentives for those types of team workers should happen after the DAO forms a budget.

2 Likes
16

These are all “housekeeping” ideas to consolidate Governance. Something like these ideas should be included in the meta proposal the GTU team will put together for a vote.

Update AIP 1

Core Mission
The mission of the AssangeDAO is to champion truth, transparency, justice, and freedom of information worldwide. Inspired by Julian Assange’s legacy, we unite cypherpunks, activists, and advocates to protect whistleblowers, defend press freedom, expose injustice and advance projects and values championed by Assange, through decentralised solidarity and action.

or something similar…

Update AIP 3
https://v1.snapshot.box/#/assangedao.eth

AssangeDAO Consensus Unit
Revoke AIP-3 “Assange Family” /“Consensus Unit” membership - by replacing the original participants mentioned in AIP-3 with Gabriel Shipton, Julian Assange and one lawyer to be determined with immediate effect by Gabriel Shipton or Julian Assange. Preferably the nominated lawyer would have DAO experience. Veto powers of the Consensus Unit would continue as described in the original AIP-3 and be included in any voting platform alterations.

(So Stella Assange and Jennifer Robinson membership would be updated)

Another idea
Update AIP 4
https://v1.snapshot.box/#/assangedao.eth

Multi Sig Team
We invite nominations for a five-member permanent multi-signature (multi-sig) team, to be formalised through a Snapshot vote. Nominees will be vetted by the Consensus Unit and GTU membership team before selection. Selected members must commit to a 12-month term, with new elections held annually. Failure to provide timely responses, engage actively in the Forum or other communication channels, or participate in meetings may lead to a review of their 12 month tenure. Gabriel Shipton or Julian Assange may also nominate potential multi-sigs who are distinguished persons and may wish to collaborate with the Assange DAO.

Another idea for the GTU meta proposal

Interim Voting Platform Confirmation
The DAO should continue to use Snapshot in the interim to implement the DAOs ideas for revenue earning projects whilst experts from the community (see team organisation idea below) convene to examine and report upon alternative voting platforms such as tally, Aragon etc (as per Logan’s Proposal re votin platform analysis)

Another idea

Who Can Be Proposers
The DAO should revoke the original list of proposers which created stagnation and vote to allow any member to author a draft proposal using the format established during the GTU process. This has become the accepted norm during the revitalisation phase and should continue post-GTU.

Another idea

Formation of Post-GTU Teams
The DAO hierarchy/structure will feature the Consensus Unit, and initial teams comprised of 3-5 personnel each with appropriate backgrounds who will develop roles and convene meetings and provide reports to members monthly on the Forum. Their initial task will be to evaluate the Project ideas which were generated on the Forum during the GTU process. Any DAO member may also be encouraged to contact these groups with additional input concerning those project ideas. Note professionals may be recruited externally, if necessary.

Treasury
Technical
Legal
Operations
Marketing

Any improvements - keep adding or suggesting.

2 Likes
17

Yes, there are too many “shoulds” that need to be done, but no one is doing them! Who should be the first responsible person for the DAO, the helmsman and the promoter? Before the governance is implemented, it is obviously Gabriel, who is obviously not serious.

If the governance cannot be implemented immediately, can things like deleting the multi-signatures and proposers who have left be done immediately? Do we need to waste six weeks on a separate proposal? It is ridiculous to wait six weeks for the proposal to issue an official announcement of the remaining funds! Aren’t these things something that should be done right away?

If the competition between countries and companies is at such a responsive speed, being eliminated is inevitable. How many more bureaucratic, careless and ridiculous things do you have to do! @Gabriel @SilkeNoa @bz404

Well, since the big aspects cannot be achieved quickly, we will break down the big problems into small problems and solve them one by one, and issue proposals one by one. Forcing GTU to express its position after six weeks is boring.

1 Like
18

They probably don’t have any time to reason, there’s nothing they can do

19

Regarding the issue of community governance, I still think that we cannot switch to on-chain governance now. The discussion on this matter last year directly caused the community to split, and the constant quarrels caused the governance to stagnate again. Now I still think that this matter cannot be implemented. There is not enough consensus, no funds and technical teams, and no strong leaders to promote it. Therefore, the success rate of this matter within a year is extremely low. It is unwise to switch the governance method at the risk of splitting the community again. The current snapshot is enough to meet basic needs. It is not too late to switch the governance method after the community governance is improved.

Therefore, we should now focus on what can be implemented immediately, instead of finding that we have only done one thing in a few months when we summarize, confirming the new candidates for GTU, and then there is no other progress. We have been arguing and discussing, and there is no other progress. This will exhaust everyone’s last enthusiasm. Therefore, what can be done immediately without disagreement, decompose the tasks, implement them little by little, and complete them little by little, instead of discussing and arguing for a year and then making a big one, and solving them all at once. No one has such patience.

The governance issue has been postponed for three years and has not been implemented. When you issued $justice and took eth from us, did the terms of the contract say that it would be impossible to establish a governance system for the community for more than three years? It is already a de facto breach of contract, so @Gabriel speed up, Before the governance is implemented, you are still the first person responsible, so I hope to see your proposals and participation.

20

With all due respect, Gabriel is not responsible for DAO, please stop spreading lies. There is no legal action associated with him, he is only working with the DAO as a consensus unit. If DAO chose not to work with the consensus unit, he wouldn’t be here.
What’s really lacking is ideas. It’s the members who drive good ideas from the bottom up. Since its inception active members have done nothing but abuse, demand, and point fingers like leaders, no substantive ideas, more dependency and unprofessional operations.

21

What is a lie? Have you made any constructive contributions so far except quarreling with community members and creating community divisions? If the voices of the majority are lies, then you represent the truth? I have nothing to say to you, and most community members here have nothing to say to you either. We have been quarreling with you since the first day and are tired of it. I think you are a cancer in the community, no one likes you, and there will be quarrels wherever you appear. Please leave to Abnormal Human Research Center.

In addition, please do not participate in any reply to any message I send, and I will not have any interaction with you. Please respect yourself.