Thank you. Not an unexpected obstacle when the DAO has no project income. Outsourcing may have to be considered.
Respecting common sense is enough, it doesn’t require too many fresh ideas, such as Assange’s public gratitude to DAO, the return of remaining funds to DAO, The Assange family has an obligation to do these two things for the DAO, rather than the few people left here to discuss and decide nothing, why are the others not here? they left disappointed. they were not thanked, and it is unknown what family did for the return of the remaining funds.@Gabriel.
About appointing a couple of high profile people for the multi-sig. I think it’s worth considering. We need excellent talents to join us
Yes—every other crypto project works hard to foster a positive atmosphere; this place feels like the exception. But the hostility didn’t appear out of thin air. In my view it stems from a long-standing communication gap between the core team and the wider community. People here genuinely want to move the project forward, yet they keep running into a wall of silence and inaction—so frustration festers and turns into conflict. Better dialogue and transparency from the core members would go a long way toward restoring trust and letting everyone pull in the same direction.
1 Like
Yes,you are right.
A major bottleneck is that none of the core members feel accountable to the DAO. Because they see themselves purely as volunteers, any contribution is viewed as a favor rather than a responsibility. When “helping out” is optional, essential tasks slip through the cracks and the community stalls.
How do we change this?
It feels like we’re back to square one: this is the reality of the community—we want change, yet we’re powerless to make it happen
No - the DAO could concede that external professionals in various fields should be recruited. Members should just maintain Governance.
1 Like
Are you saying someone is already working on deploying on-chain governance? I reached out to Amir and asked if he could help. He replied that he has already written the contracts — we just need to test and deploy them.
However, I’m not technical and don’t know how to handle that part, so I also asked Zylo if he could coordinate with Amir to complete the process. I’m not sure if they’ve managed to connect yet.
That said, what we really need now is to see an open discussion on the forum that outlines the concrete steps or a detailed roadmap for implementing on-chain governance. This will allow the community to properly assess the approach — is it secure? Is it truly more decentralized? — and then make an informed decision through a vote
I actually suggested to the core members that we could use treasury funds to recruit technical professionals to help implement on-chain governance—but no response received，So I don’t know how to proceed with this suggestion.
1 Like
Is there any other way out of a labor shortage???
In reality, if we focus on $JUSTICE and successfully drive its price upward, it could naturally attract many new contributors to join and help build the DAO. A rising token price sends a clear signal of momentum and potential — and that energy can translate into real community growth and renewed participation.
It can become a positive flywheel: price movement brings attention → attention brings contributors → contributors bring development and legitimacy → which in turn drives further interest and value. That’s how many successful communities got their start.
1 Like
That action plan is an investment project to boost the treasury and increase membership. It is ethereal, distant, non-precise for attracting the best mix of highly skilled personel. Even that project - the time factor for achieving that - with nobody being active…???