Reminder: Nominations for Multisig

Reminder, please ask questions and consider who to vote for for Multisig.

As per AIP-15 that the community voted on: AIP-15: Addition of Two Multisig Signers, with Defined Roles and Open Selection Process

Official process started August 4th:

We are now in the * Discussion Period: 2 weeks (Ends Sept 8th)

  • Community members may ask questions, show support, or express concerns regarding nominees.

As the time has past for Nomination Process (Ended around August 25th)

  • Duration: 3 weeks
  • Eligibility: Open to self-nominations or third-party nominations (with nominee confirmation)

After Sept 8th the DAO will launch a proposal for the Multisigs to be voted on.

好:+1::+1::+1::+1::+1::+1::+1::+1:,感谢您为社区的辛苦付出!

I think all candidates should answer the questions in this thread and reply after that post. @versky @qingfengeth @Logan @sudongpo

1 Like

We also need to clarify if we are having 2 Proposals to vote for the Multisig Members or if we are just doing 1 Proposal and the top 2 are added, as Individual wallets can only vote for 1 option with our voting strategy on Snapshot.

For example

(Option A) - 1 Proposal

  1. Versky (@michael_web3)
  2. qingfeng.eth
  3. Loganweng
  4. sudongpo
  5. None of the Above
  6. Abstain

Where the top 2 are added - but the drawback of this is people cannot vote for 2 members - (Snapshot forces you to pick ONE option only with our voting strategy)

or

(Option B) - 2 Proposals

Select First new Multisig member

  1. Versky (@michael_web3)
  2. qingfeng.eth
  3. Loganweng
  4. sudongpo
  5. None of the Above
  6. Abstain

Then after it has passed (say Logan is chosen for example)
Select second new Multisig member

  1. Versky (@michael_web3)
  2. qingfeng.eth
  3. sudongpo
  4. None of the Above
  5. Abstain

Option B seems the better choice. It lets people vote for each slot, and avoids unpredictable and unwelcome results that could yield odd results. For instance:

If candidates A and B both have the support of 80% of DAO members and candidate C has the support of the other 20%, it is conceivable that candidate C could be elected despite having only the support of a minority of members and there being more popular candidates.

A single vote could work if there was ranked choice voting - but that doesn’t seem like an option.