Proposal: Multisig Signer Selection Framework and Charter Implementation

General
21

  1. I have been here since the first day of donating, and I don’t have much memory of this matter. Since I have seen it now, I will fully oppose it.

  2. That means you haven’t solved the problem fundamentally for three years, still solving the problem for the sake of solving it. In the past three years, you have never urged Gabriel to solve the problem of personnel diversity.

    Why haven’t you done so? If you have done this in the past three years, the community will respect you and make up for it. You can now initiate a proposal to urge Gabriel to bring supporters of Assange and Wikileaks into the community. I will be the first to support you, and you will be a significant contributor to DAO.

22

To be frank, WikiLeaks supporters have been here from the start and have been quite active. It wasn’t until a group claiming to represent a certain community imposed a mass ban on them and prohibited discussions about Assange’s case that I saw them disappear from here.
Also I want to say the DAO doesn’t need to take on political tasks like DEI. The key members of the DAO are more important is passionate about supporting Assange’s cause, and their selection just needs to avoid certain risks is ok. Assange and his fans aren’t something that can be brought in by individuals. As long as the community is built to be attractive enough, they’ll come on their own.

23

" a mass ban on them"? stop confusing right and wrong. what everyone sees is that members of the Chinese community are constantly being deleted by you.

The community is in a mess because of you guys who are stirring up trouble and causing chaos here. the real supporters left.

24

Nonsense cannot change the facts; the Internet has already recorded everything. It also cannot help you.