The starting point of Assange Dao was the issuance of justice tokens, but you always attack the existence of tokens and say that it will affect Mr. Assange’s reputation, which is ridiculous. Assange Dao is incomplete without tokens, so please stop attacking token holders and let the direction of the community be decided by voting.
1 Like
You always emphasize that developing a token economy would damage Assange’s reputation. But in reality, it’s precisely because the DAO hasn’t been developed over the past three years, the token economy has been neglected, and the interests of token holders have been ignored, that Assange’s reputation in the crypto space has fallen to an all-time low. That’s just the truth, isn’t it?
You constantly talk about protecting Assange’s reputation, but in reality, it seems more about trying to please the Assange family while turning a blind eye to these facts. Arguing with you feels pointless.
You don’t need to reply. I just expressed the views of the majority of the community on you, and I was telling the truth. I am not the only one who saw your excessive remarks on Telegram and Discord, attacking community coin holders many times, being proud of not holding tokens and wanting to control Assangedao at your own will, which everyone can confirm. Therefore, we oppose you joining GTU because you do not represent the interests of everyone.
1 Like
Everyone donates to Mr. Assange, and Assangedao issues justice tokens to everyone, which is mutually beneficial. Assangedao tries to increase the value of tokens as a reward for donors, which will only make Mr. Assange’s reputation better. On the contrary, the tokens in the hands of donors are worthless, which is a damage to Mr. Assange’s reputation. But your idea is the opposite.
1 Like
To clarify the 10 days accounts for the nomination period of the candidates only.
Ten days wasn’t set as the final selection or vetting time frame.
Zylo has been successful and a second person has yet to receive two votes due to the need to conduct a thorough background check.
Quoting from the ratified AIP-12:
** After the 10-day nomination period, the three founding GTU members (Silke Noa, Gabriel Shipton, and BZ) will review nominees and select two additional members:*
The AIP-12 did not say that the vetting process was part of the ten days, basically.
2 Likes
Are you a supporter of Assange? First of all, you haven’t donated much money to Assange. Secondly, you have been destabilizing the community and creating divisions. The tone of your speech and the effect of your actions are the same as E. It is obvious that as long as you are here, the community will be as strife-ridden as when E was here… Another E, creating disputes in the name of Assange, you can see that the entire timeline has been polluted by you. Don’t pay attention to 35 and skip his posts directly.
It’s nice to see the caliber of discourse has improved 哈哈.
I feel like the personal insults are unproductive. It’s clear there is some division about how to move forward as a DAO. These problems have been litigated by the community many times in discord and telegram. Insulting other members in this forum is not going to effect the outcome of the nomination process either way.
I found @versky 's claims about the NFTs surprising and it seemed like a red flag. I’m glad to see there is some sort of verification ongoing. I think this sort of diligence is important for maintaining the integrity of the GTU as we push into this new phase for the DAO.
3 Likes
Versky’s profile is excellent. He is very professional in blockchain operations and insights, and is willing to join GTU. Can the decision makers further investigate and confirm that indefinite delays are not good for project developers? We hope to speed up the selection of GTU candidates.
Well that’s part of what makes it suspect right? It would appear to be a great application were it not for the bits that appear to be fake.
These aren’t difficult accomplishments considering the price levels of the assets. Why make it up? 
1 Like
It took a month to select a temporary GTU. I can’t imagine how difficult it will be to push for the next step of governance. Where is the problem? Can anyone come out and express it?
3 Likes
People should post their Draft Proposals or proposal ideas already. That’s one thing you can control. So far only Zylo has done it.
2 Likes
@Gabriel @SilkeNoa @bz404 Please make your decision,Let’s move on to the next step.This is just a temporary GTU,When governance is back on track, this temporary GTU will no longer exist.
1 Like
Slike, BZ and myself have agreed Logan should be part of the GTU as the second new member.
Congratulations @Logan ! Looking forward to working with everyone to make the DAO great.
6 Likes
thanks,it’s a great honor to be GTU member，I will do my best and put in the most enthusiasm to complete the work.
2 Likes
Congratulations @Logan !
2 Likes
Thanks，now we can move to the next step
2 Likes
Congratulations Logan
Thanks.looking forward to make Assangedao great again
1 Like
congratulations,we can move on to the next step and work together
Thanks.Does GTU need to be added to the proposer or multisig? my understanding of API12 is that GTU temporarily replaces the previous proposer or multisig. Not sure if it’s correct