Nominations for AIP-12 GTU

General
1

Nominee: Zylo @zylo_eth
Public Profiles:
Contribution History: Longtime supporter of Assange,Assangedao Early Contributor，Multisig,Proposer,core memeber,with strong technical knowledge
Nominee:PeterT @PeterT
Public Profiles:
Contribution History:Longtime supporter of Assange. Has a high degree of activity and affinity, and has been providing quality information to the community for a long time. And has professional analysis.

6 Likes
2

I am nominating @laoda and I also would like to vouch for @zylo_eth.

Nominee: Laoda 老大 aka Whitegrape

Public Profiles:
Twitter: https://x.com/whitegrape19
Opensea: https://opensea.io/LaoVault/

Contribution History: Original AssangeDAO community member and vocal advocate for Julian, contributed to the auction and collector of the Censored* collection (382 tokens), respected member of the Pak community with significant NFT holdings (1500+). Also bilingual English/Chinese.

Vouches: I, @yxssxn, vouch for this nomination as an early AssangeDAO community member, auction contributor, $JUSTICE holder. I think their connection to the artist Pak, support for Julian and ability to speak bilingual Chinese will help bring a balance and perspective that can bridge factional interests.

Alignment Statement: “I am a fierce advocate of free speech and anti war. I did contribute to the auction and still champion the collection. I think what we accomplished with AssangeDAO is an important example of how collective action can be achieved with cryptocurrency. I will seek to uphold Julian’s values by maintaining that philanthropic vision for the DAO and working to avoid $JUSTICE becoming just another shitcoin.”

4 Likes
3

Is Laoda - going to come here to respond.

When I heard of this, I also thought you might be interested @yxssxn - a long term moderator, tech capabilities and astute contributor?

4

@laoda is here. I can’t personally commit the time to the GTU but I will help where possible.

3 Likes
5

I am here and flattered by @yxssxn 's nomination. I am happy to commit whatever time I can to the GTU.

I would second a nomination of @yxssxn as they are fantastic. Unfortunately they say they do not have the time to personally commit to the role.

3 Likes
6

Nominee:qingfeng.eth @qingfengeth
Public Profiles:
From fundraising to rescuing Mr. Assange, I have been doing community publicity work. I have tried my best to achieve the core goal of cohesion and eliminate community differences. In addition, I have formed justice-eth LP in uniswap for a long time, and my LP for more than a quarter of all liquidity pool funds.

Nominee: Logan @Logan
Public Profiles:
Mr. Logan is an active contributor to the community. He has been working hard to eliminate misunderstandings among community members, and has always adhered to the Assange spirit and fairness and justice.

3 Likes
7

Nominee: 三十五
(pronounce as San shi wu)
Public Profiles: https://x.com/sanshw35
Contribution History: Joined the community from the first day of Juicebox contribute and participated in all proposals that made it to vote or not. And actively communicate and provide personal input to the proposer. Understand community development, understand the spirit of Mr. Assange, and adhere to the core mission of DAO.

3 Likes
8

Is @zylo_eth available for that kind of role?

9

I vouch for your loyalty to Julian, 三十五. and your deep understanding of the history of the DAO and your social justice credentials and vision. I think your inclusion would add balance.

It would be sensible to have a GTU with tech, marketing, financial and social justice credentials.

So that’s 4 nominees Zylo, Laoda 老大,
Qingfengeth and San shi wu 三十五 - should all 4 just added if Gabriel and family do a security check behind the scenes?

2 Likes
11

Nominee: sudongpo @sudongpo in telegram

  1. I donated 0.17m to dao, which made a great contribution to the freedom of assange.
  2. I have been an active member of dao for a long time, and I actively speak for community affairs, and even my words are fierce because of the pursuit of justice. Most community members are familiar with me.
  3. Keep communication with WHS for a long time, and actively strive for the interests of the community when dao is in a low ebb.
2 Likes
12

I also vouch for san shi wu! They have been a steadfast supporter of Mr Assange and active in the DAO since the beginning.

2 Likes
13

Nominee:Logan
Public Profiles:https://x.com/Loganweng01
Contribution History: I am an early donor to AssangeDAO, drawn in from the very beginning by my deep admiration for Assange’s beliefs and courage. Without hesitation, I committed myself to this cause, and for years, I have remained steadfast in my support.

I have remained in the community, witnessing its growth and evolution. I fully understand the challenges it faces and the conflicts among its members. I tried my best to mediate these differences, hoping to make this community—united by a shared belief—stronger and more cohesive.

I have continuously urged the core members to fix governance and push the community forward, never giving up.

As someone who holds more than 1% of the tokens, I not only understand the community’s needs but also share in its collective vision and values. AssangeDAO is more than just a blockchain experiment—it is a symbol. It represents freedom, justice, and the power of decentralization. No matter the challenges we face, I have never given up, and I never will.

3 Likes
14

I support zylo and Logan ,laoda He never appeared when the community was in trouble.I don’t support him

1 Like
15

I am against Laoda and san-shi-wu, I doubt they have any justice token. They cannot guide the community to develop normally

2 Likes
16

As this process comes to a close I would encourage the consensus unit members @Gabriel @SilkeNoa @bz404 to parse the names of any potential nominees in the various telegram and discord channels to see their past comments.

Not surprisingly, I note many of the nominees had been previously using slander against family, legal and even Julian. It’s easy to see comments calling for refunds, attempting to liquidate the treasury, unseat the consensus unit and so on outside of the governance flow. In my opinion this should invalidate them for consideration entirely.

It is also worth noting that some nominees have not been able to fulfil the basic requirements of the template by providing a public profile, or to complete the simple task of writing an Alignment Statement. Perhaps this is a language barrier issue, but in any case it is a low bar that has not been met.

I would also encourage consideration given to which “community members” are vouching for which nominees and what their association may potentially foreshadow. Having said that, I hope the GTU has a balance of viewpoints.

Onwards with the DAO in a positive direction!

2 Likes
17

There are now 6 nominees

1, Zylo
2. Laoda 老大
3. Qingfengeth
4. San shi wu 三十五
5. Logan
6. sudongpo

How could the treasury be best protected from the current volatility given that it has markedly dropped in the last few days? How do you approach financial management?

If you were asked to review a revised Vision statement for the AssangeDAO what elements would you prefer to see prioritised?

How would you detect/flag whether a proposal contained a risk/security/threat assessment?

1 Like
18

I am against sanshiwu. He does not uphold the spirit of fairness and justice of Assange and has been arbitrarily banning coin holders in Discord.
I also do not support laoda. When the community encounters difficulties and disputes, I do not see what he has done for the community.
我们是需要真正维护阿桑奇公平正义精神和真心为DAO做贡献的

2 Likes
19

Hello Peter, please check my nomination info, thank you!

Nominee: Versky (@michael_web3)

Public Profiles:

Contribution History:

  • Major Token Holder: Holds approximately 5% of the total $JUSTICE tokens and has consistently held these tokens without selling, ensuring alignment with the DAO’s interests. Maintains a neutral stance, committed to representing the diverse perspectives within the community.
  • Early Donor: Contributed to AssangeDAO via Juicebox, becoming an original member.
  • NFT Collector: Participated in the NFT auction, acquiring over 20 pieces from the Censored* collection.
  • Crypto Project Background: Actively involved in the development of multiple crypto projects, showcasing a strong commitment to the blockchain space.
  • Technical and Marketing Expertise: Possesses extensive experience in the crypto and fintech sectors, having collaborated with leading projects like ConsenSys and LayerZero, and participated in multiple hackathons, earning accolades.
  • Hackathon Achievements:
    • exSat Ideathon Selected Project
    • BGA Incubation Selected Project
    • BNB Chain Hackathon 2nd Place
    • Binance Hackathon 1st Place
    • Polygon Grant Recipient
    • AvesHack Grant Program Recipient

Alignment Statement: As a significant token holder who has maintained my holdings since the inception of AssangeDAO, my interests are closely aligned with those of the community. I am committed to upholding Julian Assange’s values, advancing the DAO’s mission, and maximizing the value of the $JUSTICE token.

Additional Information: I would love to represent token holders within the Governance Transition Unit (GTU), leveraging my extensive experience in crypto project development and my proven track record in hackathons to contribute effectively to the DAO’s development and governance.

3 Likes
20

Thanks Versky (@michael_web3)

There are now 7 nominees

1, Zylo
2. Laoda 老大
3. Qingfengeth
4. San shi wu 三十五
5. Logan
6. sudongpo
7. Versky (@michael_web3)

How could the treasury be best protected from the current volatility given that it has markedly dropped in the last few days? How do you approach financial management?

If you were asked to review a revised Vision statement for the AssangeDAO what elements would you prefer to see prioritised?

How would you detect/flag whether a proposal contained a risk/security/threat assessment?

21

I do not support San Shi Wu. He is a disruptor of AssangeDAO and has never considered the token holders. In the community, he constantly fuels conflicts, and many early donors were easily kicked out by him, leading to even greater chaos.
I also don’t support Laoda
San Shi Wu and Laoda have never actively pushed for proposal progress or spoken up for the community members. They only appear when there is progress in the community, attempting to take credit.
Aside from these two, I support all other nominees —they truly represent the interests of token holders and will speak up for us

3 Likes