You want to blur the concepts of abusive harassment and expressing an opinion? You won’t succeed!
Why do so many people recognize zylo, but no one has come out to recognize and support you so far? Because zylo has been contributing to dao and has not made any negative comments. He can consider the interests of everyone and push forward step by step, but you are biased and think about problems from your own perspective.
1 Like
I used to discuss developing token economics in the old forum. I designed one myself. But I suspended it when I realized there might be legal issues involved.
As for why someone might not like me don’t need to ask me, all the info is publicly out there so you can see for yourself.
With the concept of 35, volunteering with Assange Campain would gain more recognition and a sense of achievement, and perhaps you would have a greater sense of value with Assange Campaign Instead of appearing here, in a place that is not recognized, you will not have a sense of value, always surrounded by frustration. I don’t know what you are seeking, continue to undermine the consensus here, and argue with others. Obviously, no one likes to identify with you here. If leaving is better for Assangedao please leave. Look at Amir, when he feels not accepted and leaves, this is also a normal reaction of a person.
1 Like
Yes,I agree with you, Delaying for too long is harmful to the community, and the message it sends is that they do not trust the community and are unwilling to let it decide on the candidates. It is difficult to imagine that other things in the future will also be decided by the community.
1 Like
How long should we wait? Another month or two? But what was said before was ten days. This is just a transitional candidate and not an official candidate，Yes, the current consensus is that anyone outside of 35 can choose and everyone can accept it. Let the community decide, instead of continuing to delay
1 Like
Your comments no doubt expose the ploy of some to drive away loyal supporters - which is what this group has been doing - so as to make this a platform for hype. It can damage Assange’s reputation. I don’t think your comments can support Assange’s ideals and you can’t act in Assange’s best interests.
If the DAO wishes to take Assange’s name, then preserving his reputation is an important matter!
Everyone holds justice tokens and hopes that they will appreciate. This is not a reason to damage Mr. Assange’s reputation. Why do you always put the token economy in opposition? You don’t hold any tokens, but you want to make decisions on behalf of all token holders. This is unfair. Maintaining Mr. Assange’s reputation is not a choice between maintaining tokens, but a community that complements each other and is indispensable. Please abandon this terrible idea of yours. This is the most discordant voice in the dao.
2 Likes
The starting point of Assange Dao was the issuance of justice tokens, but you always attack the existence of tokens and say that it will affect Mr. Assange’s reputation, which is ridiculous. Assange Dao is incomplete without tokens, so please stop attacking token holders and let the direction of the community be decided by voting.
1 Like
I won’t respond to lie makers anymore unless you are telling the truth
You always emphasize that developing a token economy would damage Assange’s reputation. But in reality, it’s precisely because the DAO hasn’t been developed over the past three years, the token economy has been neglected, and the interests of token holders have been ignored, that Assange’s reputation in the crypto space has fallen to an all-time low. That’s just the truth, isn’t it?
You constantly talk about protecting Assange’s reputation, but in reality, it seems more about trying to please the Assange family while turning a blind eye to these facts. Arguing with you feels pointless.
Has anyone else actually proposed token economics? What I’m against is the use of token price as a development goal for DAOs - it’s not an option for most people. The fact is that no one has come up with meaningful token economics to discuss, but instead liquidity the treasury and the like with the intent of damaging Assange’s reputation or even the token holders.
You don’t need to reply. I just expressed the views of the majority of the community on you, and I was telling the truth. I am not the only one who saw your excessive remarks on Telegram and Discord, attacking community coin holders many times, being proud of not holding tokens and wanting to control Assangedao at your own will, which everyone can confirm. Therefore, we oppose you joining GTU because you do not represent the interests of everyone.
1 Like
Everyone donates to Mr. Assange, and Assangedao issues justice tokens to everyone, which is mutually beneficial. Assangedao tries to increase the value of tokens as a reward for donors, which will only make Mr. Assange’s reputation better. On the contrary, the tokens in the hands of donors are worthless, which is a damage to Mr. Assange’s reputation. But your idea is the opposite.
1 Like
To clarify the 10 days accounts for the nomination period of the candidates only.
Ten days wasn’t set as the final selection or vetting time frame.
Zylo has been successful and a second person has yet to receive two votes due to the need to conduct a thorough background check.
Quoting from the ratified AIP-12:
** After the 10-day nomination period, the three founding GTU members (Silke Noa, Gabriel Shipton, and BZ) will review nominees and select two additional members:*
The AIP-12 did not say that the vetting process was part of the ten days, basically.
2 Likes
I don’t know why admin didn’t ban this user @goudongxi in time. This is a lack of governance. The behavior of this type of user is part of a systematic attack on the DAO that may let other users who cannot tolerate such attacks to leave.
Are you a supporter of Assange? First of all, you haven’t donated much money to Assange. Secondly, you have been destabilizing the community and creating divisions. The tone of your speech and the effect of your actions are the same as E. It is obvious that as long as you are here, the community will be as strife-ridden as when E was here… Another E, creating disputes in the name of Assange, you can see that the entire timeline has been polluted by you. Don’t pay attention to 35 and skip his posts directly.
It’s nice to see the caliber of discourse has improved 哈哈.
I feel like the personal insults are unproductive. It’s clear there is some division about how to move forward as a DAO. These problems have been litigated by the community many times in discord and telegram. Insulting other members in this forum is not going to effect the outcome of the nomination process either way.
I found @versky 's claims about the NFTs surprising and it seemed like a red flag. I’m glad to see there is some sort of verification ongoing. I think this sort of diligence is important for maintaining the integrity of the GTU as we push into this new phase for the DAO.
3 Likes
Versky’s profile is excellent. He is very professional in blockchain operations and insights, and is willing to join GTU. Can the decision makers further investigate and confirm that indefinite delays are not good for project developers? We hope to speed up the selection of GTU candidates.
Well that’s part of what makes it suspect right? It would appear to be a great application were it not for the bits that appear to be fake.
These aren’t difficult accomplishments considering the price levels of the assets. Why make it up? 
1 Like