When there are calls from the community to address governance, a real governance program is presented and no one discusses it. Instead it is the desire to implement a list of extra signatories on the basis of no governance. This puzzles me.
@sudongpo is similarly calling for governance first. But it seems from his expression that he wants to fix the token price first, not the real lack of governance.
I’d say Logan’s proposal is a proposal for staff appointments, not governance.