Logan you’re doing a brilliant job. As it goes on it becomes apparent that some people don’t see themselves in future roles as they’re not fluent in English, are investors only, enthusiasts only or are non-technical/non-financial/non-marketing. It’s probably how they perceive their job skills. So, they’re shy. This seems to affect all DAOs. Everybody has their day or night job too.
But this does make it difficult. People are uncertain about the workload involved and how to achieve all the things that would give the place a boost.
Two of your proposals should be first voted on IMO.
- This one is almost ready. But include a paragraph reflecting the new Core Mission. This has to be formalized somewhere so just include it as the first paragraph under a heading.
Core Mission
The mission of the AssangeDAO is to champion truth, transparency, justice, and freedom of information worldwide. Inspired by Julian Assange’s legacy, we unite cypherpunks, activists, and advocates to protect whistleblowers, defend press freedom, expose injustice and advance projects and values championed by Assange, through decentralised solidarity and action.
or something similar…
- Include a paragraph in this proposal under the heading Attack Mitigation.
Suggested……
The multisig will regularly discuss, review and update processes to address evolving threats. The multisig will employ the most secure practical method to coordinate signing events (e.g., encrypted messaging apps or a quick video call) and avoid email for sensitive coordination. Signers will keep their workstations updated with the latest OS patches and robust antivirus software. Signers will use a hardware wallet for signing transactions and ensure private keys are generated on the hardware wallet and never used in a hot wallet. Signers will store mnemonic/seed phrases offline in a secure, physical location (e.g., a safe); never share or digitize them. Signers will document a routine checklist for standardizing the signing process. Signers must manually verify transaction details (e.g., recipient address, amount) before signing and cross-check details against trusted sources to prevent errors or malicious transactions. Any out of -pocket costs associated with the above compliance for each multisig will be paid by the AssangeDAO.
Silke could probably fix this paragraph I’ve just reworded the Polygon information on this topic. I don’t know for sure whether it’s good enough.
- Maybe edit this based on any sensible discussion points you’ve read.
Those two proposals should proceed first IMO.
After that DAO should select two revenue earning projects and spruik the Assange legacy. Zylo probably would know how much effort is required to get those up and running. Most people probably aren’t up to that level of technical know-how as they.