thanks for your suggestion. I believe that the next step should follow Zylo’s suggestion , to first define a new mission for AssangeDAO. We could integrate Gabriel’s Perpetual AssangeDAO fund idea，then subsequently build around the community’s new mission.
Perhaps we can come up with around three potential mission statements together in Zylo’s discussion topic (or even just one, if there’s strong alignment).
Once the community reaches some consensus in that topic. then submit them as a Snapshot proposal for the community to vote on. The mission statement with the highest number of votes would officially become the DAO’s new mission and guiding purpose moving forward.
Ok, I accept your apology.
We’ve had many disagreements in the past
but I want to make it clear that I’ve never tried to silence or block you from sharing your personal views by reporting you.
At the same time, I think the mods are being overly strict with post reviews on the forum now. maybe you’re also a victim of this excessive moderation. I hope the mods can be more lenient and not hide posts just because of someone’s random report.
FWIW, I think it’s auto moderation. It triggered for me once awhile ago. Part of the issue might be that more people need permissions to review auto-moderator actions so false positives don’t linger.
35 hope that budgets are formulated by people with financial professional backgrounds. Wake up! We currently have no money and no talent. Do we need to spend money recruiting a financial actuary to formulate budget plans, and then spend several months like the recruitment of multi-signature? This suggestion lacks realism and further hinders the implementation of various community wills. Is it like a person who is about to starve to death still pursuing a perfect diet in terms of color, aroma, and taste? No one knows everything about this place better than us, and no one is more capable of making budget plans than us.