I believe generating revenue for the treasury is key to the DAO’s long-term, stable development. I have advocated this principle on the old forum as well.
We can generate returns through investments of treasury funds or obtain it through donations.
Hey, Supporting Assange’s pardon doesn’t necessarily require dipping into the DAO’s treasury funds. As I’ve previously mentioned, we could initiate an on-chain petition for his pardon, which leverages the community’s voice without financial expenditure. If funds are truly needed to support Assange’s pardon, why can’t WHS’s funds be used? who do you think the WHS’s remaining funds belong to now？Can’t the remaining fund be used to support his pardon now？
This is a matter of attitude, and we can know the community’s stance on granting Julian’s pardon. You’ve already answered everything. Thank you.
Your attitude is very good，thank you
The other thing I want to say is that without a background in finance and without consulting all stakeholders in the community, you are not qualified to prepare a budget.
I have to disagree with that.
Not having a traditional finance background doesn’t disqualify anyone from proposing a budget ,this is a DAO. The whole point of decentralized governance is that anyone in the community can propose, discuss, and improve ideas together.
Preparing a draft budget isn’t about taking control , it’s about starting an open, transparent conversation about how to use the treasury responsibly. Every proposal must still go through community review and Snapshot voting, so the final decision will always rest with the DAO as a whole.
If anything, what AssangeDAO needs right now isn’t fewer voices ,it’s more people willing to take initiative and help move things forward.
This can be adjusted if the burn rate is too high - those proportions can be altered. I did a bit of research and generally those proportions Logan’s outlined are conservatively moderate.
One suggestion was to be a tad more conservative by reducing Innovation by 5% and topping up the stable investment by that. That opinion is based purely on insights from a16z and Threshold in relation to DAOs starting off with small treasuries. And ours is small and immature, operationally with no guarantee yet of revenue.
Logan can you elaborate on where your mix has been researched from? And this now all seems off topic to Gabriel’s draft proposal and deserves its own thread? Possibly cut paste into another thread.
Who hid Logan’s proposal? Why can’t I see it? Who is the administrator? I need to see which person reported this, and we need to address this egregious behavior.
@Gabriel disclose the backend data
I did this because his post was off-topic and would disrupt the discussion here. It needs to be discussed in a separate thread.
Additionally, Logan blocked my rational criticism and questioning of him.
IMHO someone ignoring you isn’t a reason to delete their posts.
1 Like
Don’t judge others by your own petty standards
.I haven’t done anything ,and I honestly don’t even know how to report anyone.
Also, my post did not go off-topic. Gabriel was talking about setting up a perpetual AssangeDAO Fund, and my suggestion directly relates to that ,it focuses on how to allocate treasury resources to create sustainable and stable revenue for that very fund.
You’re absolutely free to disagree with my allocation plan, but it’s unfair to say it’s off-topic
1 Like
They don’t like me criticizing them is not the reason they deleted my post.
Alright, I’ve figured out what happened. This matter is closed. I wrongly accused you, Logan. I apologize to you.
Logan I wish you would move it to another thread because its a significant Draft Proposal that applies to asset management and budget allocations. I think its going to get lost here. You’ve categorised different layers and attributed proposed projects to each layer. I think the rationale for each allocation could be explored. Also there should be discssuion about using dApps which could automate Layer 1 possibly that people like Silke may know more about. I think its a huge topic to explore.
As for the PerpetualAssangeDAO Fund - I see it included in the DAOs mission and I think the community wants to see revenue come in first and not do that by selling off assets. I also hope that this would lead to a pursuit of the Wau Holland funds available. Its fit for purposes IMO. If Julian is going to be involved - is Wau Holland going to say no?
My post has been hidden, and normal communication is no longer possible here. There were already few people speaking, and now even fewer will do so. 35, you can just play by yourself @Gabriel @SilkeNoa @zylo_eth
Not me. My post also hided.
1 Like