Thanks for responding
Thanks for responding.
We don’t trust, we verify. Even the claim you hold many censored tokens doesn’t pass the smell test.
1 Like
There is no requirement that any person reveal any of their personal information. However, if you are in a forum talking to credentials and making claims about holdings and history etc. it’s not unreasonable for people to ask for the information to be verified. Again, it’s their choice. If they chose not to elaborate on the claim, the risk is they will not be believed or trusted.
1 Like
Yes,you seem to be disguised very well, very much like “E”
1 Like
This also applies to laoda and san shi wu
1 Like
35 is a controversial person who contributes to the division of the community. Such a person leading the community will inevitably lead to greater division. I firmly oppose his election.
Laoda is a new face who became a deserter during the most difficult times in the community.
I suggest selecting from familiar faces who are still stuck in the low point of the community and have a relatively high acceptance rate in the community. What the community needs most now is people who can bridge differences and establish consensus. Besides Zylo, I recommend Logan, followed by me.
3 Likes
My wallet is attached to the message that nominated me, you are free to look!
2 Likes
I cant speak for the other two questioning, but as the largest holder/trader of the censored nft tokens I definitely care about when people claim to hold them! If he does, thats a good thing, its a reason Id consider supporting his candidacy.
@versky I dont think asking someone to share an anon address is rude, mine was included in my nomination. This anger towards the request makes me more skeptical of the other things you write.
2 Likes
A considered conciliatory note/message/statement is an act of professionalism. I also believe that people may feel happier to share some verifiable personal info behind the scenes. So Silke and Gabriel can read the responses and can ask further questions to all nominees. That would be the fair thing to do. Also each nominee should probably be asked to provide a secret identifier so that nobody tries to impersonate to become a threat actor.
3 Likes
2FA should be used instead of a secret code word that could be invoked in a social dispute.
1 Like
Yes whatever is the current best practice for DAOs security.
3 Likes
I would nominate myself, but given that most of you know, that I am of the opinion that the AssangeDAO was engaging in fraud, and that the Assange family would just disqualify me for wanting to sue Wau Holland over returning the funds, I doubt they will ever allow me to take over.
What I have been up to:
I am building an entire decentralized machine learning operations framework by converting the entire hugginggace transformers library from python and pytorch to javascript / webnn, and then connecting that to IPFS / libp2p / filecoin into a graphrag architecture
Building up entire corpora of legal documents, generating vector embeddings and knowledge graphs, so that I can eventually turn them into domain specific first order logic (deontic logic), to provide the loss / reward function during reinforcement learning
A 3d animated avatar to take the complaints of the users, and automatically convert them into a complaint PDF, that can be submitted to a court for relief from the injuries caused by third parties.
While I am going to use this for primarily civil rights cases, I am also contemplating using it to have the AssangeDAO members sued as well, because even good people do bad things, and as they say “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”.
1 Like
I guess because I have been programming for 30 years and have actual competence?
I know, i get the your an asshole a lot, but I am also always right.
As a coin holder and a volunteer who donated to rescue Assange, I require every Nomineer to show their wallets address.
I don’t believe that a person who has not donated to rescue Assange can bring progress to the community.
1 Like
AIP-12 has been accepted by the community. The GTU nomination process can proceed. Please add any more nominations so we can summarise all the nominations.
5 Likes
GTU is only adding two places. Currently, there are more than 5 people who have signed up. We think it is enough to choose from among five people. I recommend Zylo and Peter. There is no need to wait any longer. Let’s speed up and enter the governance stage.
2 Likes
agree,no needs to wait any more,It has been 20 days since this topic was posted.I also recommended Zylo and Peter before,but Peter said no.
1 Like
TBH I think you should confirm with Zylo too Logan as they haven’t responded and may prefer to remain in the background. (haven’t fully completed their nomination information)
3 Likes