Amir previously suggested in the AssangeDAO Telegram group that adopting Tally could upgrade the DAO’s governance system to a more robust, on-chain framework. However, he did not provide specific implementation steps or a detailed roadmap for this transition. It’s unclear whether Amir has the time or intention to submit a formal proposal draft on the AssangeDAO forum. We are seeking input from technically knowledgeable community members to develop and share a comprehensive feasibility plan under this topic.
The plan should:
Assess the feasibility of transitioning AssangeDAO’s current governance (based on JUSTICE token voting, primarily off-chain via Snapshot) to Tally’s on-chain governance system.
Outline specific implementation steps, including technical requirements, smart contract integration, and community engagement processes.
Estimate costs (e.g., gas fees, development, and deployment) and propose funding sources (e.g., DAO treasury or community contributions).
Address potential challenges, such as voter participation, gas cost barriers, and alignment with AssangeDAO’s decentralized ethos.
Propose a timeline for the transition and governance upgrade.
Optionally, suggest whether Tally’s MultiGov feature (for multi-chain governance) could be relevant, given AssangeDAO’s operations on Ethereum.
We encourage technically proficient members or teams to post their ideas or draft proposals on the forum, building on Amir’s suggestion and leveraging Tally’s capabilities as described in public resources (e.g., Tally’s documentation and case studies with DAOs like Uniswap and Arbitrum). If Amir or others have additional insights, we welcome their contributions to refine the plan.