Mr. Assange is free, but the Assangedao community of tens of thousands of people is still not free. The community needs to develop, not just stand still because of one person’s manipulation. It’s been almost three years, and Assangedao has not been recognized or developed. It’s terrible! What are you waiting for? Either give the community independent power and let them vote to decide on development, or reorganize the administrators and develop the dao together. Please take action as soon as possible, and don’t be incompetent and do nothing.
3 Likes
At the time E was pretending to be doing work here - there were many great suggestions and draft proposals from Andrew Teh, Zylo and PMA - the workhorses of this place in the early days. In particular, Andrew Teh wrote extensively about Governance. Why their work was not formulated into Proposals for voting by the management team (those with proposal rights) is unknown. They did not seem to be controversial and they were concise.
If the DAO could revise those ideas via a paid administrator or operations manager expert and incorporate into a Governance structure (by also granting them with Proposer status), I think most problems could be resolved.
Running on volunteers IMO, is haphazard. Successful DAOs hire consultants and experts.
-
We need confirmation of who out of the current mult-sig team are active.
-
The current list of official Proposers.
-
We need a statement about the current liaison between the multi sig, Harry Halpin and Gabriel with Wau Holland re whether there will be any fund reimbursement to the DAO either directly or indirectly via another foundation.
Let’s put a date on this. Feedback from management and those who hold multi sig keys is required by next Friday, 22 November 2024. I think it is reasonable, participants have been waiting for weeks without useful insight into what is happening behind the scenes.
Individuals could then decide what to do with their participation, based on facts, henceforth.
In the meantime - we can all be positive - by adding our future project ideas to a thread here.
3 Likes
This might be Snapshot under the Members tab
Some of the addresses are named at The First Step Toward AssangeDAO Governance - AssangeDAO
But I agree it would be good to get official confirmation of that and the rest.
加密世界正在蓬勃发展，现在最关键的是首先要有一个合法的投票平台，一些紧迫优先可行的想法，可以先形成一个决议，而不是一直卡在这里，什么事情都做不了。
3 Likes
AIP-12 updated so GTU works with consensus unit rather than replacing it.
3 Likes
I’ve reposted a copy of the PDF: AIP-12 v1.2.pdf (382.1 KB)
Thanks Gabriel. Discord isn’t loading this. Can’t view it there.
Query - just to confirm
Are Silke Noa, Stella R Magnet and BZ available to be members of the GTU?
I thought Stellar Magnet was not available to be on the GTU? Haven’t heard anything lately on the forum from BZ?
1 Like
I think it needs Gabriel to reach out to these core members to bring them on board for fixing the governance . Without their participation, we cannot accomplish anything.
1 Like
Tagging @Gabriel @SilkeNoa and @bz404 to make sure they saw PT’s post. (I’m not aware of any other organizers, multisigs, or consensus unit members on the forums)
I don’t think any of these were answered or acknowledged, though Gabriel did post in the thread.
I did receive a response from Wau Holland Stiftung to one of my questions last night. They wrote that the final transparency report “will be ready by the end of November. And the general gist of it will not be much different from the preliminary report.”
As to other questions - apparently we should go to Germany in April and ask in person at an event.
