zylo, building on your outline in #2, here is a draft we could put to a vote. Nobody has suggested changes to the vision or the four values you proposed, so they’re in as you wrote them, with the two values from #3 added. If you’re happy with it, could you upload it to Snapshot on 1 November, together with AIP-22 (the Perpetual Fund grants, in its own thread)?
AIP-21: Supporting statements for the mission
1. Summary
AIP-18 made peace AssangeDAO’s mission. This proposal adds a vision, a set of values, and a short test for whether a piece of work fits the mission, so that holders, signers and applicants read the mission the same way.
2. Motivation
A mission says what the DAO is for. It does not say how to judge a proposal or a request for funds when the case is unclear. Most DAOs publish a few supporting statements for this. AssangeDAO’s earlier drafts of these (t/285) were never voted on.
3. Proposal details
Vision
A world in which truth reduces the power of lies to start wars, and no one who speaks for peace has to stand alone.
Values
- Neutrality: we neither support nor oppose any political party, government, or candidate.
- Solidarity: the worldwide network that helped win Julian Assange his freedom is our model.
- Truth as the method: we pursue peace by making facts public and checkable.
- Open coordination: cryptography and public process, not closed deals.
- Accountability: every treasury action is posted in full before it is signed, so any holder can check it, unless an AIP provides otherwise.
- Dignity: we don’t use war or suffering to promote the DAO or the token.
The mission test
A proposal, project or grant fits the mission when the answer to all four questions is yes:
- Does it help resolve conflict or build understanding, or support people who speak up for peace?
- Does it respect the neutrality principle?
- Can the people receiving support lawfully accept it?
- Will they report back publicly on what was done?
These statements are published alongside the mission on the DAO’s website. They can be amended by a later AIP. This vote authorizes no treasury spending.
4. Voting options
- For
- Against
- Abstain
(Approval voting is set for the whole space, so please tick only one option.)
5. Implementation
Discussion until 31 October 23:59 UTC. Uploaded to Snapshot on 1 November 00:00 UTC; the vote opens on 2 November and closes on 4 November. $JUSTICE-weighted.
───
中文
zylo，以下是在你 #2 框架基础上整理的、可以付诸投票的草案。到目前为止没有人对你提出的愿景和四条价值观提出修改，所以它们按你的原文保留，另外加上了 #3 中提出的两条。如果你同意，能否在 11 月 1 日把它和 AIP-22（永续基金资助规则，另开帖子讨论）一起上传到 Snapshot？
AIP-21：使命的配套声明
1. 摘要
AIP-18 确立了和平为 AssangeDAO 的使命。本提案补充一句愿景、一组价值观，以及判断一项工作是否符合使命的简短检验，让持币人、签名人和申请人对使命有一致的理解。
2. 动机
使命说明 DAO 为何存在，却没有说明在情况不明确时，如何评判一项提案或资助申请。大多数 DAO 会为此发布几条配套声明。AssangeDAO 早期草拟过的版本（t/285）从未经过投票。
3. 提案详情
愿景
一个真相削弱谎言发动战争之力的世界；在那里，为和平发声的人都不必孤身一人。
价值观
- 中立：不支持、也不反对任何政党、政府或候选人。
- 声援：以那张帮助朱利安·阿桑奇赢得自由的全球声援网络为榜样。
- 以真相为方法：通过让事实公开、可核查来追求和平。
- 开放协作：依靠密码学和公开的程序，而不是私下交易。
- 问责：每一笔国库操作都在签名之前完整公开，任何持币人都可以核对，除非 AIP 另有规定。
- 尊严：不利用战争或苦难来宣传 DAO 或代币。
使命检验
一项提案、项目或资助，只有在以下四个问题的答案都是"是"时，才符合使命：
- 它是否有助于化解冲突、增进理解，或支持为和平发声的人？
- 它是否遵守中立原则？
- 受资助方能否合法接收这笔支持？
- 受资助方是否会公开报告做了什么？
这些声明将与使命一起发布在 DAO 官网上，可通过之后的 AIP 修订。本次投票不授权任何国库支出。
4. 投票选项
- 赞成
- 反对
- 弃权
（整个空间设置为认可投票，请只勾选一个选项。）
5. 实施
讨论至 10 月 31 日 23:59 UTC。11 月 1 日 00:00 UTC 上传至 Snapshot，投票于 11 月 2 日开始、11 月 4 日结束。按 $JUSTICE 加权。