Is there such a thing??? I didn’t hear that there was any formal mechanism???
The beginner’s guide should probably be considered after the community has stabilized its governance. There are too many uncertainties. Of course, it can also become the DAO operating rules, so that anyone can use this content to determine which link should be added to contribute energy.
I very much agree with the importance of protecting Assange’s reputation, because in the process of saving Assange, in addition to legal defense, it is also crucial to obtain broad sympathy and public opinion support. But this is not the reason to stop DAO. We need to actively explore solutions. The excessive control of DAO by human factors is an important reason for the deterioration of the situation. We need to establish rules to allow DAO to improve itself and establish an irreversible consensus unit to ensure that DAO does not go towards the opposite of saving Assange.
Communication is really important, but based on the current state of DAOs, a lot of capable people have left. This requires that the few managers who insist on staying can act forcefully to establish governance rules for the DAO, which is the basis of all development.
It couldn’t have gotten any worse, we’re at rock bottom, we should be thankful we won’t lose more, and we’ll be dawning soon.
This is the abbreviation of Wau Holland Foundation by the Chinese community. There are indeed inaccuracies in the expression, and I will correct it.
In addition, if the DAO is in an ideal state and makes a continuous contribution to saving Assange, it should be possible to apply for financial assistance from the foundation.
The Wau Holland foundation is a non-profit and has to conform to a German regulator. That money has been set aside for Assange’s legal costs. Should be clarified with Gabriel Shipton whether there could be an application process.
Based on the status quo of the community, talking about the application for foundation funds too early can easily lead to disappointment, but no one can deny that it is a possibility. The DAO building the treasury should not give up any possibility because our resources are so scarce.
@rave & @zian: writing about Wau Holland Foundation on April 16, multisig and core-team member @Zylo stated:
Yes I recall reading that.
I don’t think this statement closes the door unless the Wau Holland Foundation makes a statement through official channels that under no circumstances will they make donations to the DAO and will not attempt any kind of cooperation. In addition, any final decision of the DAO should be confirmed by snapshot voting, not personal will. Just like my reply above, discussing the Foundation’s affairs will not lead to any results. We must first make the DAO better.
Is this acquisition information at least still correct? Must it also be MetaMask? Help!
It is feasible to trade through the metamask wallet, but it may face relatively high transaction fees, and the final transaction price is uncontrollable to a certain extent.
At present, justice can be purchased on many other exchanges. JUSTICE实时行情_JUSTICE实时价格_JUSTICE今日价格行情-非小号
I would recommend mexc.com, because its trading volume is relatively large and the transaction will be smoother. At present, the price of justice currency is low, there is no good news in the short term, and the currency price is easily manipulated, please invest with caution.
I would consider this to be a donation rather than an investment - thank you for the feedback. Im going to have to do more research to work out the first steps prior to selecting a wallet. Its ALL new learning for me.
Sorry if I’m over-stepping - but I’m even more of a n00b: I am not a cypherpunk (and I know we’re supposed to be, here), only someone who wants to save Julian and is trying to see where to contribute time effectively. That desire brought me to the DAO, partly cuz of its huge (historic?) success and partly b/c I’m not sure where to go.
But I bet some people here do know many groups/projects that exist out there - so if anyone wants to list/explain those (or knows where to find such info), it would benefit me (and others, too, I hope).
What to do next?
My idea to complete governance and raise funds - RECRUIT an industry recognised person - an engineer/and or crypto expert (high profile only in industry circles, like MoonDAOs Pablo Moncada-Larrotiz) to finalise the project.
We have an expert legal figure on the project. There must be recognisable respected industry personnel to take this forward, supported by voluntary members.
The DAO requires prestige for future growth and direction/stability/growth.
Depends on where you live. Best place to look would be on twitter IMO. Search for “Assange” and learn.
You can read @Rick_Velvet ‘s speech or contact him, in DAO, he is the person I see active and insist on trying to use DAO to “save Assange”.
At present, DAO is still in chaos and has not entered into the ongoing governance. There are many plans that are just in the planning, but we hope that people who have the ability and faith can pay attention to DAO and contribute at the right time and place.
Hey Zian.
Actually I want that we all have a common home and also use the forum more often. Right now there is not much activity anywhere and I would love that we continue with proposals and activities to free Julian. If that will not happen, I’ll consider more convenient ways than a DAO to help Julian. I’m just a regular supporter though and people seem to forget this, probably because I was more active than others. ^^
Hello, when you issue tokens in the encrypted world, you have the attribute of investment. If it’s just a simple donation, you don’t need to issue tokens, do you? Even if many people came with the idea of investment, this action also raised a lot of money for Mr. Assange.
Dao doesn’t necessarily need money from the German foundation
However, we need some competent people related to Assange to help Dao, which is also responsible to investors. Although most investors have left now
Do you know why many people in Dao community have always stressed the need for German foundation money? Because at present, Assange related personnel are unable to give energy to the community. Only through the money of the German foundation can we convey the signal that our community is still full of hope to the outside world. Otherwise, you can see that many capable people in the community have left. Can I understand that the relevant personnel took advantage of the donation and issuance of tokens to get the money and left
I understand that you are a novice in the encryption world, so I want to explain it to you in more detail. At present, the projects that use JBX platform to raise funds are generally used for the development of Dao community and the initial common purpose of the community Our community is difficult to develop now. At least in the Chinese world, the mention of our community is negative information. I have participated in many Dao, moondao, peopledao and so on. Basically, every community has a team of core personnel. They are very responsible and friendly to community members. But at present, I don’t know where the core personnel are in our community. They are very busy every day. The development of the community seems to be just a thing they have to deal with. I think community governance needs those core personnel to solve it quickly, rather than those of us who have no rights to discuss here every day. In the end, we waste a lot of time and have no results.
I keep suggesting that the direction here can only be resolved by a key person or two (recruited and paid) similar to the calibre of a leader that runs another successful DAO.
I think a person should be recruited at least for 12 months with the task of managing the DAO and making it grow.
The original team could not be expected to remain and not be paid forever - eventually people have to eat and pay off mortgages.
The DAO has been a success no matter if it folds, it raised millions for Assange’s legal defence. Quite possibly this may save his life. The DAO has only $400K to play with (hopefully that is invested properly given the current climate) - it’s not going to go far.
As for newbies to the DAO - there does not seem any clear direction.
All division of rights is not effective communication, caused by his family and sign on behalf of the community of users, no communication, every day with the cia as an excuse, if there is a cia into he dao, others catch you earlier, after all, you made a user’s $50 million, also sent tokens, this law is illegal in the United States, American law has a long arm and is now costing coin holders dearly