i tihnk ofcourse disagree
Members of the Gnosis Safe multisg will follow the recommendations of the Assange family when it comes to the bidding strategy proposed. While there are differing opinions from the community, the multisig cannot go against the wishes of the Assange family as outlined in the governance process. This has been clearly communicated in governance processes since the beginning. Hence AssangeDAO will be executing a maximum bid of all of the ETH raised from Juicebox (minus the Juicebox fees/JBX tokens).
First of all, I would like to thank the team for get this great initiative off the ground. Also big kudo to Pak for the interesting and creative NFT.
However, there remain numerous question un-answered regarding the nature of the fund and how it will be spent.
1- in this proposal, the rationale of max bid is not sufficiently explained. Why max bid is the best strategy and why it is necessary.
2- where is the budget for the anticipated legal expense? even ball park estimate is better than nothing.
3- Once the money goes to Wau Foundation, how would the DAO members know whether they are spent responsibly?
I take the view that this DAO fund is public money. Public money at this quantum calls for extremely high standard of transpanrency and accountablity. Based on what happen so far, non of these exist.
following the spirite of Assange, I ask tough questions for truth to be reveal to all who make contributions to this great cause. If I were banned for this, everyone in the forum should know the true nature of the team and the DAO.
without clearing these questions, my answer is a firm NO.
I aslo want to highlight that the views and opinions of the family memers of Assange are of great importance. However, this is a public fund. Not private money. I hope Assange family also recognise the and take community view seriously. I believe Assange would want everyone of us to do so.
This is not a famil fund. This IS a public fund. As a lawyer, you should know the difference well. Assange family matters, so do DAO members. It is NOT their money yet.
This is a DAO , we can win the auction and still have reserve in the Treasury NOT for monetizing $JUSTICE . As a DAO dedicated to free Assange, we will need something in the Treasury because this case is going to get more interesting now that , the government is aware of our moves. Do not bid all on the art.
My vote : Do not bid all on the art
Unfortunately this is not a vote, but a post by multisig holders confirming the family support the maxbid strategy. The multisig holders have no choice but to comply with this. In the current governance structure, Assange’s family have the final authority. If the DAO questions this structure we can change the DAO governance processes.
+1
As a multisig holder I would like to make it clear that I lent my reputation to the DAO for the limited duration of the auction with the sole purpose to bid on the NFT according to consensus strategy, defined by Assange family.
I am not a decision maker, organizer nor will I keep being core member of the DAO in the future. My function as msig holder ends with the auction. If there are any other plans with the DAO outside of the auction bidding and minting of $JUSTICE, I will not be participating and the DAO needs to find a replacement for my multisig position.
Dear Mr. Shipton,
It is with the greatest disspointment of my life to leave this message here. I have been a long time Assange sympathiser.
But what happened in this DAO makes lose faith in his cause. I know it does not matter as powerfuls are always powerfuls. I am just one man.
I would vote for sending all the money to help Assange even if the bid was not won. It is the principle at stake. I thought you and the Assange family understood the importance of transparency, accountability and due proces better than anyone in this world. What you, Stella, the multisig and the core team are doing here completely destroy the very foundamental values Assange stands for.
While you value your success in monetary terms, what you and Assange have lost are meaning and purpose.
I wish Assange, Stella and their beautiful child all the best. But Assange’s fight may no long be mine anymore.
cheers,
So you are saying it is okay for a handful men/women decide the fate of many?
After this open scam im sure you and julian wife will go to prison. Open fraud. Its just beginning.
I disagree, I support bidding for NFT with enough eth, and let DAO manage NFT and the remaining eth, so that more people can rescue Assange. If all eth is used for bidding for NFT, then it is obviously a scam to start financing in the name of dao. Since dao is not needed, why use the name of dao, which will increase the legal risk faced by Assange.
the world needs to be heard!!
I disagree -1, we need liquidity, JUSTICE !
Disagree -1. Not all funds need to be used.
I disagree -1, we need liquidity, JUSTICE!
Agreed. +1 Lets go all in.
If people want to do liquidity nothing prevents the token-holders from voting and boot-strapping their own liquidity pool, or someone actually doing it with their own liquidity.
Maxbid was not a unanimous decision. Many in the community disagree with the choice and have voiced this on the forum.
There are those of us who entered AssangeDAO believing in DAOs as a powerful tool for mass cypherpunk coordination. We rejected maxbid because we believed the DAO more capable of managing the funds in a transparent, accountable and collective way than a traditional foundation.
However, Assange’s family expressed their support of maxbid and the multisig signed off on the transaction.
$JUSTICE has rallied together a young and ideological community, unified in their support of Assange. I believe this is only the beginning for AssangeDAO. DarkFi is committed to building anonymous DAO tooling to serve this community directly.
I disagree -1, we need liquidity, JUSTICE !