【Google Translate】 @TomStairtsen @PMA
I can’t believe why you see the existence of the foundation as a division of the project, is it right that everything else should be at rest because there are no rules for DAO governance, no treasury. This is a DAO organization that should allow some people to form groups to do what they think is right. Any decision that ultimately represents the will of the DAO should be decided by a snapshot vote, and no one is more in favor of this than me.
AssangeDao is no longer a cohesive organization after a few people alone decided to put all the donations to auction, and the treasury was empty.
The community didn’t have any money to push anything, and then some people donated money to set up an organization to facilitate things in the community that would benefit the development of the project. So far, the foundation has supported several spontaneous marketing activities by community members and airdrop activities. Most of the initiators of these activities are non-donors of the foundation. Any subsequent donor can initiate a proposal on behalf of any member of the community to request funding for what they think is right.
The reason for the release of this governance rule is to avoid the collapse of the only positive energy I have seen in this project because of the stagnation of the project and the fall of the currency price. So what do you think this organization should be called, the AssangeDAO Foundation, the AssangeDAO Community Foundation, the AssangeDAO Chinese Community Foundation or the Justice Foundation, it’s just a name. The only consideration in choosing the current name is the hope that the foundation will have the support of the entire community.
Your biggest misunderstanding is that all Chinese members are trying to gain rights. You can interview any of the donors on the foundation’s giving list and see if they take pleasure in the fact that the governance rules give them the right to vote. Or do they think that the formulation of governance rules is only to avoid the operation of the foundation from being controlled by personal factors, and at the same time to ensure that any team in the community can obtain the support of the foundation.
As for why you think you should spend energy promoting the foundation instead of contributing to the DAO. In fact, the current situation is that most of the donors have lost faith and motivation in the project. Most of the work of the foundation’s governance rules is done by myself. My only purpose is to hope that the foundation can maintain normal operation. The governance rules are now complete, and I have also ended all work with the foundation and have no role in the foundation, which can be confirmed to any donor.I have replied to the PMA thing in discord.
Finally, I would like to say that some people complain that why the affairs of the community are not determined by the governance rules of DAO, and at the same time they refuse to establish complete governance rules, they are afraid that the Chinese who have the majority of voting rights will take the project to the unknowable status. Complaining can’t solve any problems. I personally will try to promote the formulation of DAO governance rules in the next time. I hope you don’t think, look, the Chinese are coming to control DAO. My only appeal is to hope DAO can follow the rules. Keep running.