Should AssangeDAO continue to focus on its founding premise ‘Free Assange by All Means Necessary’ or Pursue other Activities?
-Continue to focus on Freeing Assange
-Pursue Other activities
If AssangeDAO chooses to pursue other activities the Advisory Council is disbanded so those questions become redundant. I suggest leaving the Advisory Council questions off at this point.
There has been a HUGE demand from the community to close the mint option on the $JUSTIC contract, so in order to give stability to token holder i suggest this should be a question actioned immediately.
Justice Token
Should minting of Justice token be closed
The core mission right now should be focusing on freeing Assange, this is why we start the DAO and yes we should close the minting of Justice token for $justice holder.
These two issues are really very very improtant. AssangeDAO must continue to be AssangeDAO, not other DAOs!
Minting of Justice token should be closed for the stability of the community.
The cancellation of the rights issue is imperative, not only for the long-term development of the project, but also for the rescue of Mr. Assange. Because our community is still in its infancy, there is an urgent need for more consensus to forge a solid wall against those who maliciously slander Mr. Assange.
取消增发是当务之急,不仅仅是考虑到项目的长远发展,更是为解救阿桑奇先生做出的明智之举。因为我们社区还处于襁褓的婴儿,急需通过更多人的共识来铸造铜墙铁壁,去抵抗哪些恶意中伤阿桑奇先生的人。
The cancellation of the rights issue is imperative, not only for the long-term development of the project, but also for the rescue of Mr. Assange. Because our community is still in its infancy, there is an urgent need for more consensus to forge a solid wall against those who maliciously slander Mr. Assange.
Whether Assange can be liberated is the most concerned issue of the holder. If the heat of the coin is as high as Shib, it must be beneficial to Assange’s liberation, and the premise is the safety of the holder. This proposal is great