这个发帖中针对阿桑奇家人的指控是不负责任的。这除了伤害阿桑奇家人的感情,增加项目的混乱以外,我想象不到有任何好处。
首先是项目开始时官网已经讲清楚了项目资金用途,他们只是执行了最初的计划。
从项目发展角度讲,在历次会议中,阿桑奇家人那边也承认了可能不是很理解DAO的运行模式。因而到当前,他们都是非常积极配合的状态,也提出了一些合理的后续方案。这意味着增加国库资金、回购Justice等提升项目质量度的措施并不在他们的绝对反对意见中,只是需要提出合理的方案,确立了治理模型,按部就班推动就好了。
关于你提到的第四点。项目专注的目标和阿桑奇家族在项目中的地位,我们已经通过投票确定了,那就属于无需讨论的范畴了。任何还要去拉扯这些问题的人,除了想把项目拉回最初那段混乱不堪的状态以外,我不知道还能对项目产生任何其它积极作用。
我说的这些是我看到的事实。如果你认为我说的错了,那我承认我错了,请不要争论,把精力留在为阿桑奇项目做一些合理推动上。
Google Translate:
The allegations made against the Assange family in this post are irresponsible. Apart from hurting the feelings of the Assange family and adding to the chaos of the project, I can’t imagine it doing any good.
The first is that at the beginning of the project, the official website has clearly stated the purpose of the project funds, they just implemented the initial plan.
From the perspective of project development, in previous meetings, the Assange family also admitted that they may not understand the operation mode of DAO very well. Therefore, up to now, they are very active and cooperative, and they have also proposed some reasonable follow-up plans. This means that measures to improve the quality of projects such as increasing treasury funds and repurchasing Justice are not among their absolute objections. They just need to come up with a reasonable plan, establish a governance model, and push it step by step.
Regarding the fourth point you mentioned. The focus of the project and the position of the Assange family in the project, which we have already voted on, are beyond the scope of discussion. Anyone who’s going to pull on these issues, I don’t know of any other positive effect on the project other than trying to bring it back to the mess it was in the first place.
These are the facts that I say. If you think I’m wrong, I’ll admit I’m wrong, please don’t argue and focus on making some reasonable push for the Assange project.