We should vote how to bid. I personally want Assagedao win the auction for the lowest price possible. The rest of ETH going to treasury and contributors can vote how to use the fund.
The consensus does not seem to be bidding the maximum.
Check out Assange Family unit - Maximum Bid
This is a DAO and we must act as a DAO, that is, voting. Release $JUSTICE now.
First of all, I would like to thank the team for get this great initiative off the ground. Also big kudo to Pak for the interesting and creative NFT.
However, there remain numerous question un-answered regarding the nature of the fund and how it will be spent.
1- in this proposal, the rationale of max bid is not sufficiently explained. Why max bid is the best strategy and why it is necessary.
2- where is the budget for the anticipated legal expense? even ball park estimate is better than nothing.
3- Once the money goes to Wau Foundation, how would the DAO members know whether they are spent responsibly?
I take the view that this DAO fund is public money. Public money of this quantum calls for extremely high standard of transpanrency and accountablity. Based on what happened so far, non of these exists.
following the spirit of Assange, I ask tough questions for truth to be revealed to all who make contributions to this great cause. If I were banned for this, everyone in the forum should know the true nature of the team and the DAO.
if multisig do not heed community opinion, I believe there is a case for embazzlement.
A DAO needs Governance and also maintenance, we can win the auction with 50% , this goes to the foundation,the remaining be kept in treasury NOT for monetizing $JUSTICE . This case is going to get more interesting now that the government is aware of this DAO . So as a DAO dedicated to free Assange , we will need something in the Treasury. If the artist cancelled the auction. That means he is selfish.
He wonât.
So, Donât bid everything raised on the ART
All members of the Gnosis Safe multisig will follow the recommendations of the Assange family when it comes to the maximum bidding strategy proposed. While there are differing opinions from the community, the multisig cannot go against the wishes of the Assange family as outlined in the governance process. This has been clearly communicated in governance processes since the beginning. Hence AssangeDAO will be executing a maximum bid of all of the ETH raised from Juicebox (minus the Juicebox fees/JBX tokens).
if that happes without community concensus, i believe we or someone will sue for embazzlement and fraud. if class action is what you want.
I also want to point out that the current governance process has not been agreed by the community and contributors. It was done by a small group of people. It is not, imho, not how a DAO works.
Then why did the DAO create justice token and promised to give back a proportion for eth donated. If you just wanted to raise money, they shouldnât have used the name DAO and shouldnât create a token either. A DAO must be a DAO
Yes I agree, thatâs why itâs important that $JUSTICE is made liquid as soon as possible. $JUSTICE holders must have a voice
Marked this proposal as vetoed in the repo: