阿桑奇的热度是如何短时间归零的?

北京时间2月19日

基本面
a、Discord 中文区聊天大幅减少,接近归零。
b、Justice# 链上交易量接近归零。
c、Twitter$weibo上提到Justice项目\assangedao项目 一只手指可以数过来,关注接近归零

以上基本面表面,Assangedao/justice项目热度已归零。

复盘热度归零原因:
1、Discrod&Telegram 的中文管理依据自己的心情,大量禁言,导致关心此项目的有关人士及大户均被禁言,让社区失去活力。

2.社区走错了方向,社区往治理方向走,而疏忽了项目的核心是国库。Peoele 没有治理,只有国库,让宪法dao做到了10亿美金市值。

// 补充说明下为何往治理方向走是错的?
治理需基于精英组成的社区之上,而现有的Assangedao社区是由投机客组成。美国制度在阿富汗20年依旧失败了,并不是美国制度不优秀,而是阿富汗民众。同样的道理,由投机客组成的社区+治理=失败。什么样的社区对应什么样的策略。作为由投机客组成的社区,重点在国库而非治理。所以,阿桑奇dao往治理方向走是错误的。

From google Translation

Beijing time on February 19

Fundamentals
a. Chats in the Chinese area of ​​Discord have been greatly reduced and are close to zero.
b. The transaction volume on the Justice# chain is close to zero.
c. The Justice project\assangedao project mentioned on Twitter$weibo can be counted with one finger, and the attention is close to zero

On the surface of the above fundamentals, the Assangedao/justice project’s popularity has returned to zero.

The reason for the reset heat to zero:

  1. The Chinese management of Discrod&Telegram has banned a large number of speeches according to their own feelings, resulting in the banning of relevant people and major households who care about this project, making the community lose its vitality.

  2. The community went in the wrong direction, the community went in the direction of governance, and neglected that the core of the project is the national treasury. Peoele has no governance, only the treasury, which makes the constitution dao achieve a market value of 1 billion US dollars.

// Supplementary explanation why it is wrong to go in the direction of governance?
Governance needs to be based on a community composed of elites, and the existing Assangedao community is composed of speculators. The American system has failed in Afghanistan for 20 years. It is not that the American system is not excellent, but the Afghan people. By the same token, a community of speculators + governance = failure. What kind of community corresponds to what kind of strategy. As a community of speculators, the focus is on the treasury rather than governance. Therefore, it is wrong for Assange to go in the direction of governance.

1 Like

Please understand that governance is important for several reasons:

  1. To maintain order and prevent chaos – without a form of governance, the DAO would descend into chaos.

  2. To develop a system of law and justice – a form of governance allows for the development of a system of law and justice, which is essential for the protection of the rights and interests of the people.

  3. To allow for the allocation of resources – a form of governance allows for the allocation of resources, which is essential for the development of the DAO

  4. To provide a system of accountability – a form of governance provides a system of accountability, which is essential for ensuring that the DAO is held responsible for its actions.

  5. To provide a framework for the peaceful resolution of disputes – a form of governance provides a framework for the peaceful resolution of disputes, which is essential for the maintenance of social stability.

“”"

请明白治理的重要性有几个原因:

  1. 为了维持秩序和防止混乱——没有治理,DAO就会陷入混乱。
  2. 为了发展一套法律制度和正义系统——治理能够发展一套法律制度和正义系统,这对于保护人民的权益和利益是必不可少的。
  3. 为了允许资源的分配——治理能够允许资源的分配,这对于DAO的发展是必不可少的。
  4. 为了提供一套责任体系——治理能够提供一套责任体系,这对于确保DAO对其行为负责是必不可少的。
  5. 为了提供一个和平争议解决的框架——治理能够提供一个和平争议解决的框架,这对于维持社

The community is a group of speculators who want the moon rather than governance. Constitutional Dao does not govern, but #people are popular. The United States has been in Afghanistan for 20 years and has given the best governance to the region, but it has failed in the end. So what can be done with governance, assangedao is formed by a group of speculators, and ultimately it is a failure. We need to put more money in the treasury, then weed out speculators and give the community more confidence. Now that Assangedao has a very bad reputation in China, more and more crypto people are angry because of the price and turn to hope that Assange will spend a lifetime in prison. This is the actual reality.

Why are they angry?

I mean, the whole intention was to donate for Assange’s freedom. The goal of that project was clearly mentioned from the beginning. Assange did a huge contribution for the whole world. For the public. It doesn’t matter where we come from. His platform exposed corruption on the highest levels. The people that hope that he will stay in prison are usually the ones that support corruption or believe in the lies of the corrupted.

I don’t know what is going on in the chinese channel, because I don’t speak the language, but I read that groups have been formed that want to destroy the project, because some people thought that it’s an open crypto investment fund, which was clearly a wrong assumption. I also donated and read everything carefully beforehand. I knew that my money will be gone and go to the WAU Holand foundation.

I hope that we all will bundle up our power in order to fullfill our common goal, which was originally to support the freedom of Assange. I think the more people research what Assange exactly did for us, the more people wish him freedom. The truth should be free. Only honesty to ourselves and others can lead to a positive change.

Google translate:
谷歌翻译:

他们为什么生气?

我的意思是,整个意图是为阿桑奇的自由捐款。 从一开始就明确提到了该项目的目标。 阿桑奇为全世界做出了巨大贡献。 为大众。 我们来自哪里并不重要。 他的平台暴露了最高层的腐败。 那些希望他继续坐牢的人,通常是那些支持腐败或相信腐败者谎言的人。
我不知道中文频道发生了什么,因为我不会说中文,但我读到已经形成了想要破坏该项目的团体,因为有些人认为这是一个开放的加密投资基金, 这显然是一个错误的假设。 我还捐赠并事先仔细阅读了所有内容。 我知道我的钱会花光,然后去 WAU 荷兰基金会。

我希望我们大家都将我们的力量捆绑起来,以实现我们的共同目标,这原本是支持阿桑奇的自由。 我认为越多的人研究阿桑奇究竟为我们做了什么,就越多的人希望他获得自由。 真相应该是免费的。 只有对自己和他人诚实才能带来积极的改变。

1 Like

Google translation:

Why is there a #Justice token if it’s just for Assange’s free donation? On the other hand, Assangedao uses the DAO donation method to obtain donation funds from crypto, so it should abide by the rules of DAO and crypto to increase the market value of its related tokens. Personally, I don’t donate for Assange’s freedom, but for the #justice token. There is an old Chinese saying: “Water can carry a boat, but it can also capsize it”. The same logic, these crypto guys feel cheated, and more and more people think that assangedao has broken the encryption rules. They are unable to seek justice, almost impossible to obtain judicial aid, can only be angry and no longer want Assange to be free.

如果只是为了阿桑奇的自由捐赠,为何会有#Justice token?另一方面,Assangedao采用了DAO 捐赠的方式从crypto获取捐赠资金,那么就应该遵守DAO和crypto的规则,提高其相关代币的市值。就我个人来说,我并不是为了阿桑奇的自由而进行捐赠,是为了#justice token. 中国有句古话:“水能载舟 ,亦能覆舟”。同样的逻辑,这些crypto guys觉得被欺骗了,越来越多人认为assangedao破话了加密规则。他们无法寻求正义,基本不可能获得司法援助,只能愤怒并且不再希望阿桑奇获得自由。

The justice token is a symbol. We gained this symbol because we donated for a common goal. It’s a symbol with a metaphoric value.
Everything was mentioned on AssangeDAO.org how that project works. The intentions were clearly mentioned. This was never meant to be an open investment project in order to profit. It was a donation project. If people don’t read the rules and purpose of this project, than it’s not the fault of the project. Just because people didn’t read properly what this project is about, doesn’t justify that an innocent man, which was fighting for humanity should stay in prison. The fact that people didn’t read important information, should not lead to the wish of punishing an innocent man. It’s not my or Assange’s fault that people didn’t read that it is a donation fund. If I donate a lot of money into a project I also need to do my homework and research properly. That’s what every person should do, or?

If I read on a website “Donation”, I don’t even think about making financial profit or perceiving it as an investment opportunity.

Google Translation:

正义令牌是一种象征。 我们获得这个标志是因为我们为一个共同的目标捐款。 这是一个具有隐喻价值的符号。
AssangeDAO.org 上提到了该项目的工作原理。 意图被明确提及。 这绝不是为了盈利而进行的开放投资项目。 这是一个捐赠项目。 如果人们不阅读这个项目的规则和目的,那么这不是项目的错。 仅仅因为人们没有正确阅读这个项目的内容,并不能证明一个为人类而战的无辜者应该留在监狱里。 人们没有阅读重要信息的事实不应导致惩罚无辜者的愿望。 人们没有读到这是一个捐赠基金,这不是我或阿桑奇的错。 如果我为一个项目捐了很多钱,我还需要做好功课和研究。 这是每个人都应该做的,或者?

如果我在网站上阅读“捐赠”,我什至不会考虑赚取财务利润或将其视为投资机会。

1 Like

Do you mean seek justice from AssangeDAO, or justice from the chinese government, because I have heard both are a problem.

I am not sure if you joined primarily because you seek Justice aid for the chinese people, and how you believed the token would assist you.

I do not understand the Chinese legal system, so I do not know what to do within china. However if a person in china has exhausted all of their Chinese remedies, they can petition to the United Nations human rights commission.

Moreover in the United States the courts will let individuals sue USA corporations or corporations that do business in the USA, if those corporations aid and abet human rights abuses or any other violation of international law.

你的意思是向AssangeDAO寻求正义,还是向中国政府寻求正义?我听说这两者都存在问题。

我不確定你是否參加這個項目是因為你希望幫助中國人民尋求正義,而你相信這個代幣會幫助你。

我不熟悉中國的法律制度,所以我不知道在中國要做什麽。但是如果在中國的一個人已經積極地尋求他們的正義,他們可以向聯合國人權委員會提出申訴。此外,在美國,法院會允許個人對美國公司或在美國商業活動的企業提起訴訟,如果這些企業協助和鼓勵人權虐待或其它違反國際法的行為。

參見https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/alien_tort_statute