[Proposal] AIP-XX: Treasury Staking & Deployment Options

1. Summary

This proposal seeks community consensus on how to deploy AssangeDAO’s currently idle treasury. The goal is to determine the optimal balance between staking for sustainable long-term funding, empowering the $JUSTICE ecosystem, and preserving operational liquidity to reactivate the DAO.

The treasury has remained unused for a long period, generating no yield and providing limited capacity to support mission-aligned initiatives. This proposal presents multiple allocation options, enabling the community to choose the model that best reflects our collective priorities at this stage of the DAO’s revival.


2. Motivation / Reasoning

AssangeDAO is entering a relaunch phase that requires both funding and sustainability. The community is divided between two main views:

  • Stake the treasury to generate yields and grow financial capacity over time.

  • Deploy funds to empower the ecosystem and reignite community momentum, especially around $JUSTICE.

This proposal avoids a binary decision and offers multiple balanced allocation models, so the community can express its preferred level of risk, activation, and liquidity.


3. Proposal Details

3.1 Staking Portion

  • Staked only in transparent, low-risk, non-leveraged yield strategies.

  • All staking yields flow into a Perpetual Fund — a sustainable, regenerative funding pool dedicated exclusively to mission-aligned initiatives.

  • Staking must maintain exit flexibility.

3.2 Ecosystem Empowerment ($JUSTICE)

Funds used to activate and grow the $JUSTICE ecosystem, including:

  • Increasing $JUSTICE Liquidity Activation & Buyback Plan, utility and use cases

  • Incentivizing contributions, builders, creators, and campaigns

  • Tools, products, art, media, and global initiatives tied to $JUSTICE

  • Partnerships aligned with the mission and values of AssangeDAO

3.3 Operational Reserve

Flexible liquid funds for core operations, contributors, working groups, partnerships, and strategic opportunities essential for DAO revival.


4. Voting Options

Select one:

Option Allocation Model
A Stake 100% of the Treasury
B 50% Stake, 50% Ecosystem Empowerment
C 30% Stake, 30% Ecosystem Empowerment, 40% Operational
D 50% Stake, 50% Operational
E 50% Ecosystem Empowerment, 50% Operational
F Do Not Deploy (Keep Treasury Idle for Now)

5. Implementation Plan

If passed:

  1. A short execution proposal will follow specifying staking providers and ecosystem allocation framework.

  2. Quarterly public reporting of:

    • Treasury balance and movements

    • Staking yield and Perpetual Fund status

    • Ecosystem spending and impact


6. Alignment with Mission

This proposal strengthens the DAO’s ability to support long-term, It prioritizes sustainability, activation, and responsible treasury management.


7. Governance Notes

  • This proposal does not modify governance structure, the Consensus Unit, or veto mechanisms.

  • Any future change regarding veto rights requires a separate proposal.

great job! we’ve got your back when you take the lead.

难为你了啊!诈骗家族和几个拿多签的销声匿迹,只能靠你们几个发声得不到回应。

@Gabriel 阿桑奇家族的代理人可以积极加入社区吗,帮助社区走出困境。拯救阿桑奇使命已经完成了,你们家族对社区有一点说法吗,有一点感恩吗?哪怕找个人和社区对接,帮忙建设dao 没有,从来没有,连一句感谢的话和最基本的东西都没有。做起事情来比蜗牛🐌还要慢,效率真他娘的低

Good. We can always unstake in the future. Lets move forward with this proposal.

In Assange’s DAO, it’s correct to continue developing the mission while also developing the token economy. Only when the token economy functions correctly can it attract more talent to join the development and enrich the national treasury. Otherwise, we will remain stagnant and never progress. I strongly support this proposal and let the community decide together. Thank you.

Finally, we are moving forward. Lfg

I think C makes the most sense.

I note that the proposal does not specify the scope of treasury funds to be utilised, nor the precise amount. Is it intended to utilise all future inflows into the treasury (including yields, earnings, donations, and refunds from WH), or merely the existing treasury assets of approximately 200 ETH?

Should you wish to include future refunds from WH within this plan, please state this explicitly in the proposal. If the intention is solely to utilise the existing 200 ETH within the treasury, please make this clear.