Justice问题出在哪里???

1、社区通过捐赠AssangeDao帮助阿桑奇家族拯救阿桑奇。那么阿桑奇家族做为回报应帮助社区增加国库来回购#JUSTICE并做销毁。这里的国库指的是ETH或者USDT或其他形式所形成的资金。目前为止阿桑奇家族做的事并没有为国库增加一毛钱,这是事实。

问题:阿桑奇家族能否起到作用?如果无法帮助增加国库来回购JUSTICE,那么阿桑奇家族存在的意义是什么? 毕竟是你我等捐赠钱来帮阿桑奇家族拯救阿桑奇。难道捐赠完后对方不做事还把他们继续供着继续跪舔?被骗第二次?

2、DAO并不是投票而是高效。到目前为止社区只做了一件事,组织大家各种投票。但投票无法增加通缩,也无法让买入高于卖出,还降低了效率。这并不是DAO,这是装DAO,DAO的核心是提高效率。

3、未构建#JUSTICE 代币经济模型。适合的有类似BNB回购销毁类经济模型。

4、关于使命:寻求正义公平,而非是拯救Asaange。

为什么不在是拯救Assange?加密社区自愿也好被骗也罢,实实在在的付出了5000万美金的现金努力。但Assange家族及相关人员并没有在帮助#Justice上做出实质性的帮助。如:提高jutice市值或者帮助回购销毁Justice。所以加密社区默认被骗,那么不该在此纠结还继续去拯救Assange,那才是真正的傻逼。

5、关于社区:留下聪明人,而非愚蠢之人。为什么“世界第二军事实力”的俄罗斯 打不过排名垫底的乌克兰军队?而且还输的很惨? 因为普京独裁专制,导致身边留下的都是一些能力差,腐败阿谀奉承的人,这些人只会加速失败。说到项目,针对justice,早期卖空的大户们,KOL等才是聪明人,而hold不卖的可以说是愚蠢之人。需要把那些聪明人重新吸引进来,淘汰掉目前这些hold不卖的愚蠢之人。

  1. Community donated to AssangeDao in order to help the Assange family save Assange. In return, the Assange family should help increase the community’s treasury by buying and destroying #JUSTICE tokens. Here, treasury refers to ETH or USDT or any other form of funds formed through these currencies. To date, the Assange family has not contributed a penny to the treasury, and this is a fact.

  2. DAO is not voted on, it is efficient. To date, the community has only done one thing - organized a variety of votes. However, voting does not increase deflation or allow for buying to be higher than selling, which lowers efficiency. This is not DAO, this is an imitation of DAO, and the heart of DAO is improved efficiency.

  3. A #JUSTICE token economy model has not been built yet. A model that is suitable for a project like this would be similar to the BNB buy-back and destruction model.

  4. The mission is to seek justice and fairness, not to save Assange.

  5. The community should leave behind intelligent people, not foolish ones. Why is it that “the second most powerful military in the world” cannot beat Ukraine, which is ranked at the bottom? This is because Putin is a dictator who only surrounds himself with people who are incompetent and corrupt. These people will only speed up the process of failure. When it comes to the project of #JUSTICE, the early buyers and KOLs are the intelligent people, whereas those who are holding without selling are foolish. We need to attract back the intelligent people and get rid of the foolish people who are holding without selling.

这个发帖中针对阿桑奇家人的指控是不负责任的。这除了伤害阿桑奇家人的感情,增加项目的混乱以外,我想象不到有任何好处。

首先是项目开始时官网已经讲清楚了项目资金用途,他们只是执行了最初的计划。

从项目发展角度讲,在历次会议中,阿桑奇家人那边也承认了可能不是很理解DAO的运行模式。因而到当前,他们都是非常积极配合的状态,也提出了一些合理的后续方案。这意味着增加国库资金、回购Justice等提升项目质量度的措施并不在他们的绝对反对意见中,只是需要提出合理的方案,确立了治理模型,按部就班推动就好了。

关于你提到的第四点。项目专注的目标和阿桑奇家族在项目中的地位,我们已经通过投票确定了,那就属于无需讨论的范畴了。任何还要去拉扯这些问题的人,除了想把项目拉回最初那段混乱不堪的状态以外,我不知道还能对项目产生任何其它积极作用。

我说的这些是我看到的事实。如果你认为我说的错了,那我承认我错了,请不要争论,把精力留在为阿桑奇项目做一些合理推动上。

Google Translate:

The allegations made against the Assange family in this post are irresponsible. Apart from hurting the feelings of the Assange family and adding to the chaos of the project, I can’t imagine it doing any good.

The first is that at the beginning of the project, the official website has clearly stated the purpose of the project funds, they just implemented the initial plan.

From the perspective of project development, in previous meetings, the Assange family also admitted that they may not understand the operation mode of DAO very well. Therefore, up to now, they are very active and cooperative, and they have also proposed some reasonable follow-up plans. This means that measures to improve the quality of projects such as increasing treasury funds and repurchasing Justice are not among their absolute objections. They just need to come up with a reasonable plan, establish a governance model, and push it step by step.

Regarding the fourth point you mentioned. The focus of the project and the position of the Assange family in the project, which we have already voted on, are beyond the scope of discussion. Anyone who’s going to pull on these issues, I don’t know of any other positive effect on the project other than trying to bring it back to the mess it was in the first place.

These are the facts that I say. If you think I’m wrong, I’ll admit I’m wrong, please don’t argue and focus on making some reasonable push for the Assange project.

1 Like

阿桑奇家族以前不懂,可以原谅,但现在应该懂了。阿桑奇家族要做的工作就是帮助#justice提高市值。我们给了他们5000万美金,他们没有在提高市值上起到任何实质性作用。而昨天Justice已只有500万美金市值了,这已经不是不公平的事了,已经事实上成为诈骗了。

From google translate

The Assange family didn’t understand it before, and I can forgive it, but it should understand now. The job of the Assange family is to help #justice increase its market cap. We gave them $50 million and they didn’t do anything material to increase the market cap. And yesterday, Justice only had a market value of $5 million, which is no longer unfair, it has actually become a scam.

针对此项目,我们简单分两类。一、这是一个诈骗项目,所有投资人被抽地毯了。 二、这不是一个诈骗项目,但目前市值最低已跌到500万美金市值,只说明一件事,社区走错了路。额外在补充一点,DAO不是投票,投票也不是DAO。核心工作应该是确定#JUSTICE的代币经济学,例如回购通缩机制 或者其他等等,然后执行。截至目前社区并没有做这件事,阿桑奇家族及相关人的工作是帮助Justice代币经济学运行起来,例如帮助回购销毁justice等。

From google translate
For this project, we simply divide it into two categories. 1. This is a fraudulent project, and all investors have been slapped. 2. This is not a scam project, but the current market value has dropped to a minimum of 5 million US dollars, which only shows one thing, the community has gone the wrong way. Just to add, a DAO is not a vote, and a vote is not a DAO. The core work should be to determine the token economics of #JUSTICE, such as repo deflation mechanism or whatever, and then execute. Up to now, the community has not done this. The work of the Assange family and related people is to help the justice token economics to operate, such as helping to buy back and destroy justice.

Greed and selfishness killed the DAO. if JUSTICE has no value the DAO vote is trash

[image]

The original people and holders who have always supported the project are not fools, but they are tortured by fuds from every media channel. I hope the core team needs to do something. we are losing community

[image]

也许你不了解中文社区。有一点我可以告诉你。Discord &Telegram 中文社区是没有任何言论自由的。管理员删除了许多人,包括一些big holders、KOLs、真实谈论项目的用户等等。他们第一时间发现了项目存在的问题,在社区中指出来,但遭受到了禁言或者删除,出售了#justice,及时止损,这些人回头看属于聪明人是聪明的资金。

from google translate

Maybe you don’t know the Chinese community. I can tell you one thing. Discord & Telegram Chinese communities do not have any freedom of speech. The admins removed many people, including some big holders, KOLs, users who actually talked about the project, etc. They discovered the problems of the project for the first time, pointed them out in the community, but were banned or deleted, sold #justice, and stopped losses in time. These people look back on smart people and are smart funds.

1 Like