Title: Governance Proposal for Civil Rights Org
To organize a civil rights organization, whose first client just so happens to be Julian Assange, which leverages the advantages of machine learning, natural language processing, and smart contracts.
Forming a PLLC (professional limited liability company) which is has an executive director who is a civil rights attorney, who is preferably licensed to practice in the Eastern District of Virginia jurisdiction.
see here for details of what that means Private Public Interest Law and Plaintiff’s Firm Guide | Harvard Law School
Civil rights litigants are entitled to recover attorney fees in addition to actual and punitive damages, and it should be possible to use machine learning to generate legal complaints. These complaints an be tokenized into NFTs, then collateralized as a financial instrument which entitles the owner to the proceeds of the lawsuit, and perhaps bundled with many other complaints in a class action complaint. A marketplace for these complaints allows for the funding of attorneys to litigate, as well as for individuals to receive access to funds more quickly by auctioning off their rights to the proceeds. see Legal financing - Wikipedia
This concept is often called a, Private attorney general - Wikipedia and when an attorney wins a lawsuit, the losing side must pay for the winners attorney fees see 42 U.S. Code § 1988 - Proceedings in vindication of civil rights | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute Moreover under the Alien Tort Act, individuals who are suffering human rights abuses, are allowed to sue organizations in the USA who aid or abet those humans rights abuses. see e.g. Alien Tort Statute | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
The treasury will be formed by a multi-sig wallet holders voted by the token holders, who will periodically transmit money to the Attorney’s trust bank account, who will disburse money as needed for business operations. Proceeds from civil rights lawsuits will be put into a trust account for the beneficiaries defined by their ownership of the NFT complaint, the proceeds will then be converted to crypto currency and transmitted to those beneficiaries, so that the investors that helped win the lawsuit can be rewarded.
The shareholders can vote directly on any proposals, and their proposals are then executed by the executive director, who will be hired using community funds through open hiring processes, and that executive director will issue directives to the team leads (communications, paralegal, developers), who then issue directives to volunteers.
The shareholders have a right to access all internal documentation and communication between team members, but all attorney client communications are considered privileged, and the shareholders cannot interject itself into client / attorney decisions, other than the allocation of funds for the litigation.
AIPs can be submitted by everyone, but they have to be ran through GPT3 to make sure they are legal before they are accepted, and assessed for conflicts of interest (for example unjust enrichment). I do not know what a good quorum will be, as the amount of tokens and people voting with those tokens, may be subject to change. I also believe that different types of proposals, ought to have different amounts of quorum present, proportional to the impact of the proposal on the DAO. i.e. a proposal for celebrating black history month, versus a proposal about which applicant we should hire as the executive director.
I propose JusiceDAO, because we are providing access to justice, not just for Assange.
We can mass file writs of habeas corpus, and I’m wholly incorporating by reference, the previous proposal listed here: A system to mass file Habeas Corpus petitions to free assange under First Amendment doctrine . However any attempt to file Habeas petitions will have to be approved by the Assange Consensus unit, because it must be compatible with their legal strategy.
The Assange family has previously benefitted from the $52 million dollar donation, however the organization is a DAO, so the family cannot veto the owners from using their own property. However the Assange family has complete veto over any item as it pertains to Julian Assange, because we cannot represent him in a way that does not have his consent.
All individuals who work for the organization in an official capacity, should under go a criminal background check, in addition to a character fitness background check, to ensure that the org is not employing people who have committed serious crimes, have a conflict of interest, a mental impairment, or are untrustworthy.
Advantages of this structure:
If we have an attorney leading the organization, we can communicate with Assange, or any member of the DAO under the principal of Attorney-Client Privilege | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute. Moreover by having an attorney in charge, it can reduce the ability of the government to claim that the organization or any of its members to be criminally charged. The principal of Mens Rea | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute requires that a person have a guilty state of mind, and by consulting with an attorney it is hard for the government to establish a guilty state of mind. Lastly by having an attorney for the organization, people advocating to politicians may be more exempt from the requirements in FARA and related laws, which require people to register with the government if they are trying to influence government officials or politics on behalf of a foreigner. see e.g. FARA Frequently Asked Questions
We should provide a series of machine learning interfaces, which would allow laypersons to use the GPT-3 models, or models that are finetuned by the developers, to recursively generate and refine their legal complaint, using the method called “prompt engineering”. see Prompt engineering - Wikipedia Here is an example of prompt engineering: https://i.imgur.com/sRwg02k.png
The complaints will then be processed with machine learning embeddings, and classifiers. which would automatically apply labels for the types of claims, litigants, amount demanded, and type of legal problem, amount of estimated risk, and amount of estimated reward. The embeddings are used to separate the content of the complaints, so that they can be clustered or measured against each other, in terms of the distance between the semantic values in the contents. see e.g. How to do semantic document similarity using BERT - theaidigest.in. Classifiers are algorithms that apply labels to text, these labels can also be arranged into a taxonomy, and used as a tree sorting method. see e.g. https://monkeylearn.com/text-classification/
The complainant will then be given the option to tokenize their complaint, and auction off the proceeds for their rights to sue, such that individuals can assist in funding the litigation, especially when there are many people with the same legal problem, and they want to join as members of a class. see e.g. Assignment of claims . Moreover, an auction can be provide to the instant liquidity adjusted for the amount of risk, so the individual does not have to wait months or years to recover from the damages caused by civil rights violators.
I want to demonstrate what the default vanilla Open AI GPT-3 Model is capable of doing, in a few tests that I have performed. see this image gallery: GPT-3 Legal Questions Examples - Album on Imgur. These hosted large language models also have the ability to be fine tuned to fit particular purposes, see OpenAI API or in the alternative, other model providers can be used and fine tuned. see e.g. Models - Hugging Face or Pricing | Forefront
组织一个民权组织，其第一个客户恰好是 Julian Assange，它利用了机器学习、自然语言处理和智能合约的优势。
有关这意味着什么的详细信息，请参见此处 Private Public Interest Law and Plaintiff’s Firm Guide | Harvard Law School
这个概念通常被称为 Private attorney general - Wikipedia ，当律师赢得诉讼时，败诉方必须支付获胜者的律师费，请参见 42 U.S. Code § 1988 - Proceedings in vindication of civil rights | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute 此外，根据《外国人侵权法》，遭受侵犯人权行为的个人可以起诉美国帮助或教唆这些侵犯人权行为的组织。参见例如 Alien Tort Statute | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
国库将由代币持有者投票选出的多重签名钱包持有者组成，他们将定期将资金转入律师的信托银行账户，后者将根据业务运营的需要支付资金。民权诉讼的收益将存入由 NFT 投诉所有权定义的受益人的信托账户，然后将收益转换为加密货币并转移给这些受益人，以便帮助赢得诉讼的投资者可以奖励。
每个人都可以提交 AIP，但必须通过 GPT3 运行以确保它们在被接受之前是合法的，并评估是否存在利益冲突（例如不当得利）。我不知道一个好的法定人数是多少，因为代币的数量和用这些代币投票的人可能会发生变化。我还认为，不同类型的提案应该有不同数量的法定人数，这与提案对 DAO 的影响成正比。即庆祝黑人历史月的提案，而不是关于我们应该聘请哪个申请人担任执行董事的提案。
我们可以批量提交人身保护令状，我通过引用将之前的提案完全合并：A system to mass file Habeas Corpus petitions to free assange under First Amendment doctrine 的自由-阿桑奇。然而，任何提交人身保护申请的尝试都必须得到阿桑奇共识部门的批准，因为它必须符合他们的法律策略。
阿桑奇家族此前曾从 5200 万美元的捐款中受益，但该组织是一个 DAO，因此该家族不能否决业主使用自己的财产。然而，阿桑奇家族对任何与朱利安·阿桑奇有关的项目拥有完全否决权，因为我们不能以未经他同意的方式代表他。
如果我们有领导该组织的律师，我们可以与 Assange 或在 Attorney-Client Privilege | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute 的负责人下的任何 DAO 成员进行沟通。此外，通过有律师负责，它可以降低政府声称该组织或其任何成员受到刑事指控的能力。 Mens Rea | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute 的校长要求一个人有一种有罪的心态，通过咨询律师，政府很难建立一种有罪的心态。最后，通过为该组织聘请律师，向政治家宣传的人可能更不受 FARA 和相关法律的要求的约束，这些法律要求人们在试图代表外国人影响政府官员或政治时向政府注册。参见例如法拉 Frequently Asked Questions
我们应该提供一系列机器学习接口，允许外行使用 GPT-3 模型或开发人员微调的模型，使用称为“提示工程”的方法递归生成和细化他们的法律投诉。请参阅 Prompt engineering - Wikipedia 以下是提示工程的示例：https://i.imgur.com/sRwg02k.png
然后将使用机器学习嵌入和分类器处理投诉。这将自动为索赔类型、诉讼人、要求金额、法律问题类型、估计风险金额和估计奖励金额应用标签。嵌入用于分离投诉的内容，以便可以根据内容中语义值之间的距离对它们进行聚类或相互衡量。参见例如 How to do semantic document similarity using BERT - theaidigest.in 分类器是将标签应用于文本的算法，这些标签也可以排列成分类，并用作树排序方法。参见例如 https://monkeylearn.com/text-classification/
然后，投诉人将可以选择将他们的投诉代币化，并拍卖收益以获得他们的起诉权，这样个人就可以协助资助诉讼，尤其是当有很多人有同样的法律问题，并且他们想要作为班级成员加入。参见例如 Assignment of claims 。此外，拍卖可以提供根据风险量调整的即时流动性，因此个人不必等待数月或数年才能从民权侵犯者造成的损害中恢复。参见例如
我想在我执行的一些测试中演示默认的 vanilla Open AI GPT-3 模型能够做什么。 请参阅此图片库：https://imgur.com/a/4hP4R45。 这些托管的大型语言模型还能够进行微调以适应特定目的，请参阅 OpenAI API 或替代方案，可以使用其他模型提供程序并进行微调 . 参见例如 Models - Hugging Face 或 Pricing | Forefront