About AssangeDao

About AssangeDao

一、AssangeDao的主要募投人群是中文人群,这一点从推特上区块量行业的归属来源和当前官方Discord服务器中成员分布可以看出,这彰显了阿桑奇事迹在英文地区实际上并不一定像中文地区人群一样会那么引人瞩目。阿桑奇家族如果想要将营救阿桑奇的事迹得到更好的舆论支持,应该重点考虑中文人群的效应和潜在作用。
The main investment crowd of AssangeDao is Chinese. This can be seen from the source of the block volume industry on Twitter and the distribution of members in the current official Discord server, which shows that the deeds of AssangeDao are not actually in English. It must be as eye-catching as the Chinese crowd. If the Assange family wants to gain better public support for the rescue of Assange, they should focus on the effect and potential role of the Chinese population.

二、募捐阶段社群的混乱,一方面责任在于项目启动之际构建的社区管理人员自身道德水准不佳,另一方面责任在于项目发起方对项目资金分配使用方法的漠视。
The confusion of the community during the fundraising stage. On the one hand, the responsibility lies in the poor moral standards of the community managers built at the time of the project launch, and on the other hand, the responsibility lies in the disregard of the project sponsors for the distribution and use of project funds.

三、中文区的成员自发组成了强大的志愿者工作小组,提供了充分和足够支撑项目壮大的行业资源,但很遗憾,由于近一个月以来项目本身治理混乱,中文区的志愿者们没有得到才能和才干发挥的机会。
The members of the Chinese area spontaneously formed a strong volunteer working group, which provided sufficient and sufficient industry resources to support the expansion of the project, but unfortunately, due to the chaos in the governance of the project itself for nearly a month, the volunteers in the Chinese area did not get the talents and skills. Opportunity to develop talents.

四、 阿桑奇家族的人要理解一点:当项目完成募捐后,已经是一个社区Dao项目,那么项目剩余的所有资金以及推特账号、社群资源的所有权都属于社区,其管理、发展、沟通方式都应该放权按区块链行业Dao的规则来进行。
The people of the Assange family should understand one thing: when the project completes the fundraising, it is already a community Dao project, then all the remaining funds of the project, as well as the ownership of the Twitter account and community resources belong to the community, and its management, development, and communication methods all belong to the community. Decentralization should be carried out according to the rules of Dao in the blockchain industry.

五、当前已经完成了两次提案与投票,保证后续这个项目持续不损伤、侵害阿桑奇这一名誉、品牌的工作已经完成——尽管这些提案实际上并不是由社区提出的,社区已经最大化让步并投票通过。
At present, two proposals and votes have been completed to ensure that the follow-up project will continue to not damage, infringe on Assange’s reputation and brand. The work has been completed - although these proposals are not actually proposed by the community, the community has maximized concessions and Vote.

六、构建一份包括社区管理人员选拔、任免、国库资金拨付规则、社区工作人员酬劳、项目主要发展路线图的宪章,迫在眉睫。
It is urgent to build a charter that includes the selection, appointment and removal of community managers, rules for the allocation of treasury funds, remuneration of community staff, and the main development roadmap of the project.

七、Amir曾经在fourm上发布过第一版的治理规则,当前已经完成两次提案后,可以对其进行进行增删,以社区治理规则形式进行提案投票并实施。
Amir once published the first version of the governance rules on fourm. After two proposals have been completed, they can be added or deleted, and the proposals can be voted on and implemented in the form of community governance rules.

八、多签是一切治理的源头与核心,当前的多签钱包包含的五个人Amir Taaki, Rachel-Rose O’Leary, Fiskantes, McKenna, and Silke Noa,其中Fiskantes, McKenna已经离开,阿桑奇家族有责任和义务召集剩下的三人,共同执行签署将这二人挪出多签列表。
Multi-signature is the source and core of all governance. The current multi-signature wallet contains five people, Amir Taaki, Rachel-Rose O’Leary, Fiskantes, McKenna, and Silke Noa. Among them, Fiskantes and McKenna have left, and the Assange family is responsible for and The obligation is to convene the remaining three people and jointly execute the signing to remove these two from the multi-signature list.

九、组建新的多签人员,建议设定总体人数为7个人:
1)2名阿桑奇家族成员,以保证后续社区运行的所有业务和提案,不伤害阿桑奇本人及其声誉;
2)2名Dark.Fi 团队成员,以保证看好Amir团队及其加密朋克产品的社区成员投资不以遭受损失的方式离场;
3)2名社区成员,以保证来自社区的声音和要求得到执行;
4)1名律师,可请Silke Noa继续保留担任,提供法务层面的保障与咨询;
这样的话,后续所有提案与业务,按最小3/4原则,都可通过执行;同时能维持较好的安全性和博弈性。
To form new multi-signatures, it is recommended to set the total number of people to 7:
1) 2 members of the Assange family to ensure that all business and proposals run by the subsequent community will not harm Assange himself and his reputation;
2) 2 members of the Dark.Fi team to ensure that the investment of community members who are optimistic about the Amir team and its cypherpunk products will not leave the market with losses;
3) 2 community members to ensure that voices and requests from the community are implemented;
4) 1 lawyer, who can ask Silke Noa to continue to serve as a lawyer to provide legal protection and consultation;
In this case, all subsequent proposals and services can be implemented according to the minimum 3/4 principle; at the same time, better security and game play can be maintained.

十、多签人员必须设定紧急联系方式,且保证及时可被联系到与响应。
Multi-signatures must set up emergency contact information, and ensure that they can be contacted and responded.

十一、当前SnapShot上的提案作者构成,是不合理也不公平的。应该放开让社区也有提案权,而不是仅仅只有投票权。
The current composition of proposal authors on SnapShot is unreasonable and unfair. It should be liberalized so that the community also has the right to propose, not just the right to vote.

十二、AssangeDao后续可以在Dark.Fi + 中文区正义业务+Assange IP的架构下,跑出区块链行业一片开阔的天空。
AssangeDao can run out of the open sky of the blockchain industry in the future under the framework of Dark.Fi + justice business in Chinese area + Assange IP.

十三、阿桑奇先生是因为倡导新闻自由、透明、公正、民主而受到侵害,AssangeDao的属性也应该是透明、公正、民主,而不是独裁和专制。
Mr. Assange was violated for his advocacy of freedom of the press, transparency, justice and democracy. AssangeDao’s attributes should also be transparency, justice and democracy, not dictatorship and dictatorship.

22 Likes

The DAO should be democratic and its power should be relatively fair. A new proposal review mechanism and community discussion mechanism should be established before the proposal is issued, and then it is decided whether to initiate the proposal to vote

2 Likes

i agree with bz!it is good for assange dao going far!

2 Likes

Very good proposal, as a part of the community, I hope the community can build AssangeDAO together with the Assange family. give everyone some time

1 Like

You’re right, we need to come together to move the project forwardYou’re right, we need to come together to move the project forward

1 Like

I suggest signing more management framework: assange family reserve 1 vote + Assange lawyer 1 vote + Chinese-speaking community 2 votes + Technical team represented by Amir 2 votes + English community representative 1 vote seems more reasonable

Add an honorary multi-signer: Assange himself reserves a multi-signer, or vb also reserves a veto power, preventing the project from spiraling out of control, such a mechanism

Totally agree,Mr. Assange was violated for his advocacy of freedom of the press, transparency, justice and democracy. AssangeDao’s attributes should also be transparency, justice and democracy, not dictatorship and dictatorship.

Thx so much for BZ. Totally agree. The completion of the fundraising is only the starting point, we must make a difference, not what people call a “fraud”

I agree with almost everything this community member says, and we should be lucky to have such a community member.

In addition, I feel that 3-6 months more than the signing term is more appropriate. If you can’t do well, you can go down, and it is suggested that the assange family should keep the signing term

I support your proposal,it’s very important to the dao,you say what I want to say

Mr. Assange was violated for his advocacy of freedom of the press, transparency, justice and democracy. AssangeDao’s attributes should also be transparency, justice and democracy, not dictatorship and dictatorship.

I agree that the multi-signer should be re-elected or re-confirmed… It can help our community to be more united.

To form new multi-signatures, it is recommended to set the total number of people to 7:

I do not know what the best number is, but it appears that many people were annoyed that changes weren’t happening quickly enough, and increasing that number will increase that time. In the future I think that instead something should be done to implement smart contracts, and to have a veto power as a part of the smart contracts.

What about 5 signature? What do people think about ?
1 lawyer, 1 Assange family unit, 2 community members, 1 Dark.fi member

我不知道最好的数字是多少,但似乎很多人对变化发生得不够快感到恼火,增加这个数字会增加时间。 在未来,我认为应该做一些事情来实施智能合约,并作为智能合约的一部分拥有否决权。

5个签名呢? 人们在想什么?
1 名律师、1 名阿桑奇家族单位、2 名社区成员、1 名 Dark.fi 成员

I dont know what involvement Silke Noa had with legal consultations, I have actually not heard any of her specific legal advice that she has given, however if the activities of the DAO core team are a reflection of her legal advice, I would fire her as an attorney. On the other hand, since some of the dark.fi people are anarchists, then it may not be her fault that the project has been mismanaged, because anarchists don’t want to obey the law.

I that if we are going to free Assange, there needs to be an attorney who is licensed to practice in the United States, because if we file a petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to ask the court to free Assange, that is where the litigation is going to occur. I do not believe that Silke Noa is licensed to practice law in the United States, so I think we should probably hire an US attorney with the juicebox tokens.

我不知道 Silke Noa 参与了哪些法律咨询,实际上我没有听过她给出的任何具体法律建议,但如果 DAO 核心团队的活动反映了她的法律建议,我会解雇她 一名律师。 另一方面,由于一些dark.fi的人是无政府主义者,那么项目管理不善可能不是她的错,因为无政府主义者不想遵守法律。

我认为,如果我们要释放阿桑奇,就需要一名获得在美国执业许可的律师,因为如果我们提出人身保护令的请愿书,那将是诉讼发生的地方。 我不相信 Silke Noa 获得了在美国执业的许可,所以我认为我们可能应该聘请一位持有 juicebox 代币的美国律师。

AssangeDao can run out of the open sky of the blockchain industry in the future under the framework of Dark.Fi 2 + justice business in Chinese area + Assange IP.

Can you elaborate what this means, aside from the buzzwords, i am not sure if there is a problem with translation, what does “AssangeDAO can run out of the open sky of the block chain industry” mean? Also how does Dark.fi combine with “justice business in chinese area”, and what does that mean?

您能否详细说明这意味着什么,除了流行语,我不确定翻译是否有问题,“AssangeDAO 可以跑出黑链行业的开放天空”是什么意思? 另外,Dark.fi 是如何与“中国地区的司法业务”相结合的,这意味着什么?

With regards to proposal processes, I believe that many proposals are over optimistic, and are very vague. This is just human nature, because we do not know what problems will occur in a project, and so most engineering projects are over budget. This is why I believe that proposals should be broken down into a set of smaller items, which each item should state exactly what will be done and how much it will cost, then that they can be evaluated whether it is successful or not at each item. I believe this is important, because there is a tendency in democratic governments, of people who believe they can vote to spend other people’s money, only to discover that they have gone bankrupt and spent all the money.

关于提案流程,我认为很多提案都过于乐观,而且非常模糊。 这只是人性,因为我们不知道一个项目会出现什么问题,所以大多数工程项目都超出预算。 这就是为什么我认为提案应该被分解成一组较小的项目,每个项目都应该准确说明将要做什么以及将花费多少,然后可以在每个项目上评估它们是否成功 . 我认为这很重要,因为在民主政府中存在一种趋势,即人们相信他们可以投票花别人的钱,结果却发现他们已经破产并花光了所有的钱。

I couldn’t agree more with BZ.

I don’t think being an anarchist means not following the law. Rather, it is about correcting unjust censorship and laws. That’s some of the things that have happened to Assange himself. If used properly, there are multiple ways we can provide benefits to the matter of saving Assange.

On the question of how resistance to censorship can provide benefits to human social development as well as moral justice. I suggest you read @lunar_mining’s tweet, and her article.

Overall, I think this proposal is a good one and can really promote community development.

You’re right on a lot of points, but maybe the number of extra signers does go up a bit, and if we follow your proposal, I’m sure this community will form a positive spiral that complements each other.

I can not agree more with all the points here! Thank you for spending so much time to write this

Good proposal! make justice great again